Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-27-2006, 03:35 PM | #791 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Nestor.html Sherlock Holmes Gandalf Dumbledor - Iasion |
|
06-27-2006, 03:40 PM | #792 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
06-27-2006, 03:48 PM | #793 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,289
|
Quote:
Jeffrey Gibson |
|
06-27-2006, 03:56 PM | #794 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Quote:
|
|
06-27-2006, 07:25 PM | #795 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
"Didn't believe Jesus was crucified"? Why... that's heresy! Was it the Nestorians who believed Simon of Cyrene took Jesus' place on the cross and that he sneaked off to India? No, neither that group nor that idea figures into my scenario. I'll try to give it as little thought as possible. (Hmmm. How does crucifixion-less Christianity fit into the German Radical scheme that you seem so fond of?) On the other hand, I will have to think more about the roles of Q and Thomas. "VMJ" is not yet a fully formed hypothesis. It may never be one. Quote:
In any case, crucifixion is pervasive in Paul and the climactic event in all four gospels. To non-Christians, crucifixion was considered to be a shameful form of execution, so early Christians didn't flaunt the symbol. I would guess that it entered Christian public iconography around the time of Constantine. If you recall, C's mom Helena is supposed to have searched for and found the "True Cross" during her pilgrimage to Palestine. I would guess that the image became fashionable at that point. Surely you're not suggesting that the crucifixion didn't become important to Christianity until then Early Christian literature is full of it. Didymus |
||
06-28-2006, 07:47 AM | #796 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
Jake Jones IV |
|
06-28-2006, 07:53 AM | #797 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
King Solomon Jake Jones IV |
|
06-28-2006, 08:04 AM | #798 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 416
|
I think we have to make a distinction between the crucifixion "event," Paul's iconic crucified savior, and the Passion narratives in the gospels.
Paul didn't give us such an account. Nonetheless, he did preach Christ crucified, a crucified savior. The idea of a rejected and humiliated savior had roots in the Wisdom tales; there seem to have been other ancient sources as well. Those legends may well have had a role in the response to the crucifixion. And, along with Hebrew scripture, they may have been used by Mark in creating the Passion narrative. But the fact that there were such antecedents shouldn't lead us to presume that Christianity didn't have its inspiration in a contemporaneous crucifixion. Didymus |
06-28-2006, 08:31 AM | #799 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
GThomas represents a version of Christianity that does not conform to your assumption of the alleged crucifixtion as essential. Please consider that many of the sayings have parallels in the New Testament. Many of the liberal scholars, like Burton Mac, who support an HJ do so on the basis of the alleged Kingdom preacher in Q. Now, I do not know whether Q existed or not (i tend to doubt it), but if it did, then it represents Christian communities where the crucifixtion crucifiction crucifixion was either unknown or not considered very important. Quote:
Quote:
Jake Jones IV |
|||
06-28-2006, 08:42 AM | #800 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
Quote:
If the last line were changed as below, I would agree with it. But the fact that there were such antecedents shouldn't lead us to presume that Christianity either did or didn't have its inspiration in a contemporaneous crucifixion. Jake Jones IV |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|