FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2004, 08:49 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Champaign, IL or Boston, MA
Posts: 6,360
Red face

Gah! I should have looked into the issue more, I suppose.

Joel
xorbie is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 05:57 AM   #12
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by hinduwoman
Middle Eastern countries are deeply religious but their economic conditions are deplorable.

India is deeply religious too, but it has been doing better.

So how is religion involved in economics?
That just goes to show that not all religions are the same. In other words, 'our God is better than theirs.'

More interesting is how the Eastern Catholic church is mush less progressive than the Roman Catholic church and why their industrial revolution is also having a slow start. Is it because their reformation came 400 years later? . . . or is it the filioque?
 
Old 02-01-2004, 10:14 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 9 Zodiac Circle
Posts: 163
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
That just goes to show that not all religions are the same. In other words, 'our God is better than theirs.'

More interesting is how the Eastern Catholic church is mush less progressive than the Roman Catholic church and why their industrial revolution is also having a slow start. Is it because their reformation came 400 years later? . . . or is it the filioque?
What exactly do you mean by "filioque?" In Latin, "filio" is both the singular dative and singular ablative declensions of "filius," which means "son." "-que" is an enclitic that attaches to the previous word, and is translated as the word "and" (though in English it goes before the word it followed in Latin). So did you mean ". . . or is it the and by the son?" or ". . . or is it the and to/for the son?"?

I don't really have anything else to add to the discussion, unfortunately.
Chiron
Chiron is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 10:21 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

filioque - a reference to the filioque clause in the Nicene Creed, which is one of the main theological distinctions between the Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox.

Discussed here: filioque clause

Look up the historic origin of "iota" meaning a small trivial thing.
Toto is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 02:10 PM   #15
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Chiron
So did you mean ". . . or is it the and by the son?"
I don't really have anything else to add to the discussion, unfortunately.
Chiron
In my view the filioque means that the HS proceeds from the father and the son. I added that as a possible option because I think that it makes religion less mysterious, more rational and therefore more aggressive in effort to reach higher spiritual heights . . . which was bound to come to and and therefore the Reformation was inevitable. It was like 'playing with fire.'

You may think that I am nuts for writing this and must wonder how the "iota argument" can make such a big difference if it is only a small theological concept.

And while I am here, "our God is better than yours" means that our mythology/religion was more effective in its design to get people into heaven. That's all.
 
Old 02-02-2004, 08:06 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 9 Zodiac Circle
Posts: 163
Default

Ah, thanks for the info. I was quite puzzled as to the use of filioque.
Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
And while I am here, "our God is better than yours" means that our mythology/religion was more effective in its design to get people into heaven. That's all.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this means that you would convert to the religion I just made up in which everyone goes to heaven.

Nevermind the bollocks,
Chiron
Chiron is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 08:29 PM   #17
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How can a place where everybody goes be special? That would be boring, I think.
 
Old 02-03-2004, 08:19 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,565
Default

I would think that prosperity comes slowly to countries with heavy-handed government control. Often, heavy-handed government control means not only stifling the economy, but stifling religious freedom. Thus, and anti-religious, controlling government represses all religion, resulting in a populous that isn't very religious. A religous-based, controlling government (like fundamentalist Islamic governments) may stifle growth and other religions, while encouraging rabid devotion to their particular religion.

On the other hand, a more open government may allow room both for economic growth and religious liberty.

Of course, this is all unfounded speculation. But it's what comes to mind.

Jamie
Jamie_L is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.