![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Champaign, IL or Boston, MA
Posts: 6,360
|
![]() Quote:
Joel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
More interesting is how the Eastern Catholic church is mush less progressive than the Roman Catholic church and why their industrial revolution is also having a slow start. Is it because their reformation came 400 years later? . . . or is it the filioque? |
|
![]() |
#13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 9 Zodiac Circle
Posts: 163
|
![]() Quote:
I don't really have anything else to add to the discussion, unfortunately. Chiron |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
![]()
filioque - a reference to the filioque clause in the Nicene Creed, which is one of the main theological distinctions between the Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox.
Discussed here: filioque clause Look up the historic origin of "iota" meaning a small trivial thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
You may think that I am nuts for writing this and must wonder how the "iota argument" can make such a big difference if it is only a small theological concept. And while I am here, "our God is better than yours" means that our mythology/religion was more effective in its design to get people into heaven. That's all. |
|
![]() |
#16 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 9 Zodiac Circle
Posts: 163
|
![]()
Ah, thanks for the info. I was quite puzzled as to the use of filioque.
Quote:
Nevermind the bollocks, Chiron |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
How can a place where everybody goes be special? That would be boring, I think.
|
![]() |
#18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 2,565
|
![]()
I would think that prosperity comes slowly to countries with heavy-handed government control. Often, heavy-handed government control means not only stifling the economy, but stifling religious freedom. Thus, and anti-religious, controlling government represses all religion, resulting in a populous that isn't very religious. A religous-based, controlling government (like fundamentalist Islamic governments) may stifle growth and other religions, while encouraging rabid devotion to their particular religion.
On the other hand, a more open government may allow room both for economic growth and religious liberty. Of course, this is all unfounded speculation. But it's what comes to mind. Jamie |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|