![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#51 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
![]()
Still more evasion, John Deere. I figured as much.
When you feel like dealing with the following I will take note.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
|
![]()
Hi John Deere AKA Joe -
I was wondering about the statement regarding Josephus claiming to be Essene. I remember in reading Josephus being curious about how much he penned on the Essenes in the section on the "Three Sects". Not much on the other two in comaprison. He was evidently taken by them. But I do not recall him claiming to be one. Where does this come from? I don't see what is wrong with writing a book to make money, even if that is what you did. I am not saying that you did. Regardless, ideas stand or fall on their own merits. |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,060
|
![]() Quote:
A version of the first couple of chapters of Atwill's book is currently online at http://tinyurl.com/bug2n . The two most entertaining suggestions are Cannibal Mary and Fishers of men. :rolling: Jake Jones |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
![]() Quote:
What story is that tale paralleling? E. Cueva commenting on Achilles Tatius:
"Midrash" is just a fancy term for construction by paralleling from a religious text. There's no damage to Atwill's thesis here. Vorkosigan |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Santa Monica CA
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Ted:
Philo used midrashic haggadah. For the relationship between Philo's family and the Flavians, see Caesar's Messiah pages 5-6. Joe |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Santa Monica CA
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Spin:
Please answer my questions. Your statement was: “Many scholars argue that he didn't know Hebrew himself�? Therefore your citation of Ulrich’s position that “Josephus did not use the Hebrew bible when he cited from the books of Samuel�? is irrelevant. Please provide the citation where Ulrich states Josephus did not know Hebrew. Please provide citations of the “many scholars’ who argue that Josephus did not know Hebrew. (sixth request) Your position on the relative status of 1QpHab has had the following evolution: “obvious outlier�? to “fairly clear outlier�? to “periphery of the data range�? which, ignoring the mathematical definitions, is a completely new concept even from the semantical perspective and begs the question: Why would an element within a group – on its periphery – have no meaning relative to the group? Please explain. You have not answered my two simple questions needed to clarify your claim that Josephus could not have engaged in typological linkage with the Gospels. Let me repeat them. Are you claiming that Josephus could not have been told about the technique from someone else? Or, Are you claiming he could not have engaged in the technique because he wrote in Greek – the language the Gospels were written in? (fourth request) Joe |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Santa Monica CA
Posts: 132
|
![]()
Rlogan:
Whiston - Life, 1,2, 10 Joe |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
![]() Quote:
When you feel like demonstrating the following I will take note:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
![]() Quote:
He started when he was sixteen, went through the three schools, then spent three years in the desert with Bannus until he was 19. ![]() spin |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|