Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-18-2012, 05:48 PM | #51 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
|
01-18-2012, 07:30 PM | #52 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
For anyone unfamiliar with these 'TEN COMMANDMENTS' written on two stone tablets, and reportedly lugged around the desert for forty years and enshrined within the Temple, here is the actual King Jimmy version for you reading pleasure. Quote:
With THESE 'TEN COMMANDMENTS' ought also be remembered these words; Quote:
|
|||
01-19-2012, 02:59 AM | #53 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
Quote:
PART THREE LIFE IN CHRIST SECTION TWO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_cs...sm/command.htm |
|||
01-19-2012, 03:01 AM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
Quote:
PART ONE THE PROFESSION OF FAITH SECTION TWO THE PROFESSION OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH THE CREDO http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_cs...hism/credo.htm |
|
01-19-2012, 05:29 AM | #55 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
Quote:
Full Version: Hitchens and Boteach Debate on God They get into a little side spat about medical treatment of gentiles (on Shabbat) where I'm not sure if Hitchens claims are technically correct. Its not so much Hitchens out debating Shmuley, more like Shmuley coming across as a pompous dickhead. I was struck at how he mentions his debate with Dawkins several times - which Dawkins apparently never remembered. |
|
01-19-2012, 07:54 AM | #56 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
While it is not normally my style to write letters of condemnation, having read the book, I feel it poses a tremendous risk to the Jewish community and therefore imperative to state my halachic (Jewish legal) opinion that it is forbidden for anyone to buy or read this book, or give its author a platform in any way shape or form to discuss this topic.Boteach and Schochet are contestants for the title of Chief Rabbi of Britain. |
01-19-2012, 09:47 AM | #57 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
Quote:
|
|
01-19-2012, 02:55 PM | #58 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Oops! It is Schochet's son who is competing against Boteach for the role of Britain's chief rabbi.
Boteach fires back at the Schochet clan. |
01-19-2012, 02:58 PM | #59 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Oh, yeah, and Boteach has not declared himself a candidate for the position. He's just getting some good buzz.
|
01-19-2012, 03:30 PM | #60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
but totally omit any comparison with the text of those TEN COMMANDMENTS as given in Exodus 34, written by the hand of YHWH and recited by Moses into the ears of all the people, and to which they were enjoined. (Given Deut 5, apparently either YHWH or Moses suffered from a memory lapse and forgot what words YHWH Himself had written in stone in Exodus 34 But these were the very stone tablets that allegedly Moses had in hand and placed in the Ark of the Covenant for a memorial and reminder ) If there were a YHWH, and such a drastic change in the wording is accepted to have actually taken place, as it is reported within the texts. Would it not be reasonable to conclude that this change was intentional and the 'Will' of YHWH? and His servant Moses. If one writes a Will, or a Contract and never implements it, yet a month, year, or decade latter writes a much revised Will, or Contract and implements it. Which Will or Contract is the valid Will or Contract? What becomes the state of the former and unimplemented Will or Contract? I think most here know the answers. Enough with the derail, don't bother with replies. Just think about it. . |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|