FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-21-2008, 05:38 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anat View Post
But the satan isn't God's enemy - at least not in Judaism in its various stages of development. The satan serves God in his own way.
A conflict between God and Satan isn't clearly depicted anywhere in the Bible. That's an idea that comes primarily from extra-Biblical literature, such as Paradise Lost, etc.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 08-22-2008, 07:30 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 47
Cool The truth will set us all free.

Quote:
Originally Posted by paynepauldaniel View Post
Hello All,

I have never seen a Christian face the reality of Yahweh's genocidal, sadistic tendencies without resorting to new covenant explanations. Not only does this out really account for their god's evil actions, but if the new covenant is the best they can do, it also calls into question their doctrine of a changeless god.


Hail Lord Satan,
Paul Daniel Payne
:worried: Being the same today, tomorrow and yesterday does not exclude the reality that people, places and things change all the time.

Even the fact of creating a "New Testiment" means changing the old.

Quote:
Originally Posted by paynepauldaniel View Post
I was hoping to get a literalist to answer the question. I have to believe that the Yahweh described in the bible is an actual god worshiped by the ancient Hebrews, at least most of the time, and that his actions described in the bible are mostly real occurrences. This has led me to (1) see him as abhorrent, and (2) to react by worshiping his adversary, Satan.

Any literalists care to chip in?

Hail Lord Satan,
Paul Daniel Payne
:devil: I am not a "literalist" because I know the Bible has many flaws, but I do like to take up the literalist cause.

The God of the old testiment is exonerated by our own human actions.

Like the USA dropped atomic bombs on two Japanese cities and Yahweh ordered the destruction of Sodom and Gamorrah. Most people can see the rightness of the USA but decry the Bible account and thus the hypocrisy is ours.

Since God said those cities were sin filled and later Jesus said that Sodom and Gamorrah would be better off at the resurrection Mark 6:11 b then the destruction that God performed was more righteous then the destruction that the USA did since we offered no resurrection to the men, women and children duly killed.

And after that we find in the New Testiment that Jesus dis-claims the words of Moses in that Moses was teaching the people wrong per Matthew 19:7-8 link HERE.

I would say that is equivolent to comparing Moses with our President Truman who could have bombed only one (1) Japanese city - but the man bombed two.

:deadhorse: .............. :boohoo:
Booky is offline  
Old 08-24-2008, 10:12 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paynepauldaniel View Post
Hello All,

do, it also calls into question their doctrine of a changeless god.

Does it not make more sense to see Yahweh as a real, territorial god in contest with other real, territorial gods.
Yep, Christianity is a regional religion.
Alias is offline  
Old 08-24-2008, 11:15 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

The A-bomb analogy has at least one major flaw. Whether rightly or wrongly, Truman dropped the bombs as a defensive measure, to get an attacking nation to stop attacking. In the Bible, it is the Israelites, spurred on by Jehovah, who are the attackers, laying waste to the Canaanites because they happened to be sitting on some land the Israelites, for some, reason, felt entitled to.

Moreover, I'm not even sure that it is ever implied that Sodom and Gomorrah ever posed a threat to their neighbors. In fact, since the text says that "all" the people of the cities were already depraved and corrupt, I'm not sure who the victims would have been who would have needed protection.
Roland is offline  
Old 08-24-2008, 11:17 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 7,558
Default

Not to mention that the US did not create Japan in the first place and cause it to attack the US so that the US could then demonstrate its might by nuking Japan. :P
trendkill is offline  
Old 08-25-2008, 05:18 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paynepauldaniel View Post
Though I respect and used to believe the literary, naturalistic explanations given above, I was hoping to get a literalist to answer the question. I have to believe that the Yahweh described in the bible is an actual god worshiped by the ancient Hebrews, at least most of the time, and that his actions described in the bible are mostly real occurrences. This has led me to (1) see him as abhorrent, and (2) to react by worshiping his adversary, Satan.

Any literalists care to chip in?

Hail Lord Satan,
Paul Daniel Payne
If you want a literatist view, I would suggest that you use his own words:
Ex 34:6-7
6 The LORD passed before him, and proclaimed,
"The LORD, the LORD,
a God merciful and gracious,
slow to anger,
and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness,
7 keeping steadfast love for the thousandth generation,
forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin,
yet by no means clearing the guilty,
but visiting the iniquity of the parents
upon the children
and the children's children,
to the third and the fourth generation."
NRSV

I believe that the Isrealites of olde found 13 attributes of God in this passage(not exactly the same 13 found today by many Jews). Perhaps if you understood the meaning of this passage, you would stop worshipping the opponent...by the way, it would seem to me that opponent is not a very good name for a superior being...perhaps you should call him something else.
Timetospend is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.