Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-27-2007, 05:31 AM | #331 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
Dave, please show us the working of that open mind and explain: 1. How does a 200,000+ year old geologic formation support a 6000 year old Earth? 2. How do 5 million year old mountains support a 6000 year old Earth? 3. How did da FLUD produce mile deep incised meanders? 4. How did da FLUD produce vertical folded unconformaties? 5. Where in Egypt can we see this 1 mi. deep sedimentary layer? and finally Dave, your favorite question that you've cowardly refused to address for 413 straight days now, including your CM debate: Why do the multiple independent C14 cal curves all cross-correlate so closely, and all show dates well older than 10,000 years? Ya know Dave, every last one of your incredibly stupid "open minded' FLUD claims have been thoroughly debunked IN GREAT DETAIL on other threads. You know it, we know it. Why do you insist on droning on about the same refuted horsecrap? |
||
07-27-2007, 05:35 AM | #332 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
So, Dave, have you ever found ONE modern mammal fossil in the Morrison Formation?
Did you ever show how the Morrison dates are incorrect, given that I gave you oh, a couple of dozen radiometric dates on it from multiple methods? Show me WHY I should accept that this magic flood deposited the Morrison so perfectly , and other strata like limestone SO neatly while in the middle of a year-long flood? Why didn't the walls of the Grand Canyon slump, Dave? Why do you continue to avoid presenting evidence that would SUPPORT your claims and why do you instead always seek to twist science as you did with the English Channel article...an article that dates the release of Glacially-dammed flood waters at FAR beyond your flood date? |
07-27-2007, 05:36 AM | #333 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
And once again, Brave Sir Davey flees the building.
|
07-27-2007, 05:45 AM | #334 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
|
OH, by the way Dave, besides the dating on the English Channel event, I'd like you to explain how it formed a "sub-horizontal bench (~4 KM wide ,~ 25 KM long) cut into CHALK BEDROCK" (my emphasis). That's on page 343 of the English Channel article:
Gupta, S. Jenny Collier, Andy Palmer-Felgate and Graeme Potter (2007) "Catastrophic Flooding Origin of Shelf Valley Systems in the English Channel." Nature 448:7151, pp. 342-345. 19 July. How did that Chalk bedrock layer get there given even the most fantastic deposition rates in your "Young Earth Dreams/Miracles"?? |
07-27-2007, 05:46 AM | #335 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 7,834
|
ck1 asks
Quote:
afdave says: Quote:
I look forward to the results of the poll. Cheers, Lane |
||
07-27-2007, 05:54 AM | #336 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunderland, England
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
|
|
07-27-2007, 06:06 AM | #337 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,057
|
Boy, that was a pathetic last post. But then, it was expected.
I needn't comment on any of dave's already demolished (here, and elsewhere) claims: All I have to do is remind people that: Although CM responded to all of dave's questions, dave obviously, deliberately, desperately denied to reply to at least one specific one of CM's, up to his last post. And that question was "explain the consillience between entirely different dating methods". Dave had no answer. Dave lost. No poll is needed. Seeya, dave. |
07-27-2007, 06:14 AM | #338 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,057
|
Oh and dave- what are you doing in this thread, restating the same old refuted claims, as if they were something new that was never addressed?
Why don't you return to those old threads you abandoned, where your "arguments" were demolished, and try to resurrect them there with some extra support, if you can? Or are you glad they fell back, and got buried, and hope that people will forget about them, and all those questions you run away from? This is not a different forum, dave. It's still IIDb; you can't use your favorite tactics now. I you have something to say about all those claims, do so in the threads you first made them, or the ones made for just that reason. And answer all the objections and questions waiting for you there. Let's see if you can stand the heat for once. |
07-27-2007, 06:49 AM | #339 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dave? Stand the heat? Deal with questions?
:rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: :rolling: Nice one , Faid. You da funny man. |
07-27-2007, 07:18 AM | #340 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,473
|
I thought that this quote showed stunning lack of logic:
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|