Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-19-2006, 07:15 PM | #61 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 7th Heaven
Posts: 406
|
Quote:
By the way, your webpage is extremely useful. I noticed you quoting the Greek of Origin on Celsus in another thread. Did I just miss it on your website or did you look it up elsewhere? Thanks. |
|
04-20-2006, 03:32 AM | #62 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Google "Febble" if you need to find me.
Posts: 6,547
|
Quote:
But I would argue that the doctrine of the atonement, which was what you originally characterised, is a much subtler and more complex doctrine than the one you caricatured, and that there are many mainstream interpretations of it that are along the lines I gave earlier. So I will go so far as to take back my straw man argument, but will, instead, argue, that there are large strands of christendom that do not subscribe to it in the form you stated it, including some mainstream theology within the catholic church (which, for better or worse, remains a fairly large strand of christendom). Quote:
FWIW, my understanding of the doctrine of the atonement is that God became a human being (Jesus), and therefore died (as human beings all die) in order to demonstrate that he lives, and suffers within all of us, and at the hands of all of us. You don't have to believe it (sometimes I wonder whether I do) but it's not a heretical understanding (though, inevitably, over-simplified....) But you can have your straw man, as long as you accept that it doesn't necessarily blow up the whole of Christianity. |
||
04-20-2006, 05:51 AM | #63 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
Ben. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|