Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-23-2012, 09:52 AM | #231 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
it is idiotic to take sides in a battle and not follow the real history no matter which side your on. This is where Carrier shines by not taking sides and focusing on history first. populations of crowds at passover have little to do with your mythology guesses. and from how you take this view, you do biased work. |
|
07-23-2012, 12:29 PM | #232 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
Quote:
I've been thinking about the other absurd Tacitan number I mentioned, Tiberius' 5 billion sestertii treasury. The size of the coins was a good bit bigger than a quarter, 32-34 mm around and 4 mm thick. They were not precision machined so stacking is probably not possible, you'd have to just throw them in a pile and hope your input and output records are right. I'm going to go with 10 x 10 x 4 mm as their volume for 400 cubic mm. So now we want 5 billion of the things? That's 2 trillion cubic millimeters which is 2,000 cubic meters by curious coincidence. That'd be a cube 12.6 x 12.6 x 12.6 meters full of nothing but brass coins. Granted it would be smaller if denarii or aureii were used but that's still a pretty substantial pile of money. The only "official" measurements of Scrooge McDuck's money bin put it in the department of 36 x 36 x 36 meters, although that's the building, not the vault. So we're giving Tiberius credit for a pile of coins equal to ONLY a tenth the size of the fortune of a fictional cartoon duck created to be more wealthy than humanly possible. (Even if the 200 billion US coins Scrooge could fit were all dollar coins, that would make him richer than Gates, but Scrooge needs illiquid assets large enough to allow him to keep several billion in spare change.) Another comparison? All the gold in Ft. Knox is less than 250 cubic meters. Wanna argue some more about the reliability of numbers in ancient authors? |
|
07-23-2012, 12:38 PM | #233 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,387
|
|
07-23-2012, 12:39 PM | #234 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
if you want to debate from a stance of ignorance, find someone else. the whole temple was plumbed by the ponds, and springs surrounding the temple, that also had their own access. water was everywhere within the temple You should know this if you want to debate about it. I should not have to state there was more then 53,000,000 gallons of water. And that it was not the temples first time with large crowds after centuries of passover traditions in the area |
|
07-23-2012, 12:48 PM | #235 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
he said this Quote:
Quote:
he also stated historians/scholars should check to see if it had the water supply well it did have the water supply he didnt write a book on the subject for you quote. he wrote he has bigger fish to fry then this |
|||
07-23-2012, 12:51 PM | #236 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
Between your 12.6 meter cube of coins and my 36 meter cube of sheep blood, we are definitely running out of room.
|
07-23-2012, 12:51 PM | #237 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
Stop your silly nonsense the temple was the jewish treasury, I dont think there is a shortage of space on 35 acres for coins this was the most pathatic attempt at BS ive seen, next to your water debacle this shows how far you will go to try and promote your pathetic attempt to discredit scholars soley based on the fact you dont like it with no education on first century temple or jewish customs |
|
07-23-2012, 02:17 PM | #238 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
|
07-23-2012, 02:50 PM | #239 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
Oh I get it! I previously said that the amount of water might be enough for drinking, but not to wash away the human waste! But they could use all the blood for that! Six million pilgrims, 529,800 gallons of blood. Assuming one bowel movement a day per pilgrim, that's 1/12 of a gallon of blood per flush! Add in all the urine and you might just have enough!
Behold! The Toilet that Flushes with Blood! |
07-23-2012, 03:06 PM | #240 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
|
Quote:
300,000 to 400,000 pilgrans not 6 million and with over 53,000,000 gallons of water, with a daily recharge rate to keep the ponds full, the open water sewers and tunnel sewers had plenty of water to carry waist away. maybe you have historical recods stating sewers always backed up at passover ???? You know, the "passover of stinky" the year it got all backed up |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|