Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-30-2006, 04:10 PM | #21 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
|
11-30-2006, 05:04 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
|
11-30-2006, 10:54 PM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
|
|
11-30-2006, 11:10 PM | #24 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Just an annotation: the reason for the was that this Abrahamic moniker was such a &%!?* idea in the first place, Peter could have spoken a lot earlier, so that I and others needn't have suggested against it only to go unheeded due to lack of weight. That would have saved the flip-flop.
spin |
12-01-2006, 12:51 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
|
Glad it's BC&H again though.
But could we put "Myth" right after Bible? Thanks. And I think I'm sufficiently dense around here too. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|