Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-05-2012, 11:54 AM | #131 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
Indeed I am. I noticed your edit, even. And the absence of explanation for it.
Quote:
Now how about discussing those passages in the Qur'an? Or is the Qur'an no longer of interest? Quote:
|
||
02-05-2012, 12:02 PM | #132 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: u.k
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
it seems to me that muslims and christians believe in any bs. how is it that a guy who does all these amazing miracles in both qur'aan and bible doesn't get anymention outside of these books? Quote:
|
||
02-05-2012, 12:12 PM | #133 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: u.k
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
Dear mrsonic, You have received a warning at FRDB. Reason: ------- -Advisory Warning You quoted several paragraphs from an unnamed source. I'm pretty sure that your source is Richard Carrier - but it is important for you to actually give the source to avoid copyright problems. Please be careful. FRDB takes copyright very seriously. ------- |
|
02-05-2012, 12:12 PM | #134 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Interesting question to ponder:
Is it possible to identify the form of Christianity reflected in the Quran (despite some errors) that accepted the Niceno-Constantinople Trinity of the end of the 4th century and its idea of a virgin birth and important role of John the Baptist (Yahya), YET at the same time that viewed Mary without a husband Joseph and Jesus as a messenger or some kind of generic messiah to the Jews only but without any post-Nicene Pauline concept of salvation or Davidic qualifications (Bethelehem) from the Hebrew Scriptures?? |
02-05-2012, 12:20 PM | #135 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now we already know that there is not the smallest possibility that Christianity is false, but Qur'anic conceptions of Jesus may nevertheless still be of interest. That word 'christ' stuck in the gullet of the authors of the Qur'an, and it may be instructive to learn how they pretended not to be in pain. |
|||
02-05-2012, 12:50 PM | #136 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
|
|
02-05-2012, 06:25 PM | #137 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Could be, but I think there are too many elements for it to be premeditated. It still seems like second-hand information even with communities of Jews and some type of Christians in that region.
|
02-06-2012, 01:08 AM | #138 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
I think the solution is that the writers of the Quran absorbed information coming from different sources.
So it is conceivable that the story of Mary included the information that she was a virgin but that in a gospel story such as Mark they learned that she was mentioned without any reference to Joseph and put the two together, implying that the virgin bore her son alone. The same pattern could have involved the Baptist who is also briefly mentioned in Mark but whose birth story came through GJohn, which also gave the Quran the notion of Jesus the word - Kalam - despite being simply human. And of course the authors heard about a vague notion of the Trinity but never heard about Paul. |
02-06-2012, 02:41 AM | #139 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
|
Maryam Surat 19
Quote:
|
|
02-06-2012, 02:50 AM | #140 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Yes, I know that. I was exploring how this came to be historically the quranic narrative.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|