FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2007, 06:06 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisrkline View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isolde View Post
SUMMARY OF THE DEBATE SO FAR

I offered evidence from AIG, and asserted that I'm right. No one else wants to address these issues - they're trying to change the subject to "values of other pastries" while ignoring that all values come from God. Without God, why would it be wrong to wrap a sausage in a chocolate chip pancake and put it on a stick? Numberologists have no reason to not call that a breakfast food, just like any other pastry, because they have no objective source for their values.

As anyone can see, my view is the only one that is consistent with the evidence. Numbers are assigned whatever value God wants.
And how do you explain the existence of transfinite numbers?
Transfinite numbers are a SIN in God's eyes! Addition is the holy union of two finite numbers - those crossdressing transfinite freaks are an abomination.

Everything about them is unnatural. They can't reproduce by multiplication, so they have to recruit other unsuspecting young fractions into trying their sinful life style.
Occam's Aftershave is offline  
Old 09-27-2007, 06:22 PM   #32
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occam's Aftershave View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisrkline View Post

And how do you explain the existence of transfinite numbers?
Transfinite numbers are a SIN in God's eyes! Addition is the holy union of two finite numbers - those crossdressing transfinite freaks are an abomination.

Everything about them is unnatural. They can't reproduce by multiplication, so they have to recruit other unsuspecting young fractions into trying their sinful life style.
I realize that Anselm tried to show that there could be no larger number than the so called perfect power of 2, and that since this was the largest perfect number we could conceive, then this number had to exist, but evolutionary trends in modern mathematics (mainly Cantor) has shown us that the mathematical universe is infinite and constantly changing. Just last week they found another type of infinite!!

But are you one of those moderates that believe in Cantorism, but still recite liturgy as if there were originally, in the beginning, only two numbers? Next you will argue that the world is really Euclidean.
chrisrkline is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.