FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-23-2005, 09:55 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noah
Book/Chapter/Verse?
I think that he's referring to Psalms 22. That claim has already been thoroughly debunked here.
pharoah is offline  
Old 12-23-2005, 10:07 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bootjack, CA
Posts: 2,065
Default

The problem is that none of these explanations are going to have any effect on half-life. He will just shrug it all off as wrong and keep on believing whatever he wants to.
Mountain Man is offline  
Old 12-23-2005, 10:30 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Also, the "fulfilment" of Micah 5:2 assumes that Jesus actually WAS born in Bethlehem.

Apparently, he wasn't. Both Nativity stories are quite obviously fictional, and Luke even invents a census as a plot device to MOVE Jesus to Bethlehem. John doesn't bother, and John 7 strongly implies that Jesus wasn't born in Bethlehem.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 12-23-2005, 11:38 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life

* - Aristotle - 5 copies available for comparison
* - Homer - 643 copies available for comparison
* - Plato - 7 copies available for comparison
* - The Bible - 30,000 copies available for comparison (includes 5000+ Greek copies and another 25,000 written in other languages). This wealth of evidence is simply staggering.

Very interesting isn't it?

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/religio.htm
Wait... that is profoundly dishonest.

what are you considering the 30,000 copies? When you say 5 copies of Aristotle what do you mean? If you mean contemporary copies that may be true but if you're holding to contemporary copies you have zero contemporary copies of the Bible. Every copy of the Bible in extant is hundreds of years older than the alleged date of writing. Most numerous is the Septuigent, which is many hundreds of years late by people who had no connection with the supposed events.

Arguments like this are total crock.


BTW there are several million copies of Weekly World News available for comparison. How does that serve to validate its content?
jayh is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 07:25 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life
none of you failed to explain how 1,000 years earlier people wrote down Jesus would die by crucifixion.
There is nothing to explain. Nobody wrote about Jesus' crucifixion before it happened.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 08:31 AM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Bible Prophecies Fulfilled by Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half Life
The Bible does not contain the characteristic untruths of other religious books. In Job, one of the oldest books of the Bible (written in about 3500 B.C.), Job wrote, "He [God] hangeth the earth upon nothing". Back then, people believed the earth was on the back of turtles and elephants and all kinds of strange things--you will find no such ridiculous statements in the Bible. The only way Job could say that the earth was suspended in air is by the Holy Spirit of God revealing it to him.
It is equally plausible that the only way Job could say that the earth was suspended in air is by an advanced alien revealing it to him. Why do you assume that advanced aliens do not exist anywhere in the universe, and that none of them are able to convert energy into matter?

Deuteronomy 13 says that bad people can predict the future too, so it is not a question of who can predict the future, but of who has good character. My position is that God does not have good character.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half Life
Now, an important prophecy to note is the one that says that Jesus will be crucified. Now, how in the world did people 1,000 years before Jesus know that he will be crucified when CRUCIFIXION WASN'T EVEN AROUND AT THE TIME!!! How can you just shrug this off?
Where is that prophecy?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 11:50 AM   #37
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noah
The Christian hope that Micah 5:2 is messianic in Christian termes is based on a lazy reading of Matt. 2.6. If Christinas were to actually look up the verses they would see that Matthew misquotes Micah 5:2 (or:1) Matthew deletes Ephratah from Micah in order to make it look like a leader will come from the town of Bethlehem. In fact, Bethlehem Ephratah is a clan, the clan of Bethlehem, who was the son of Caleb's second wife, Ephrathah.
Matt. 2.6: "And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel."

Here's what Micah 5.2 actually says:
But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.
For what it's worth, noah, I don't think your interpretation has much to commend it.

Ephratah, as you've mentioned, was Caleb's second wife, according to the biblical text (1Chron 2:19, 50; 4:4). Bethlehem was Caleb's grandson (1Chron 2:51, 54; 4:4). But, to my knowledge, the two names are never openly identified one with the other in connection with these individuals or a clan of their namesake; Micah 5:2 would be unique in that regard, if your interpretation were correct. On the other hand, the Bible does explicitly identify a place called Ephratah with the town of Bethlehem; see e.g. Gen 35:19: "So Rachel died and was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem)." Micah 5:2 would therefore be just another example of the same phenomenon.

Also, the town was occasionally given the qualifier "in Judah" (e.g. 1Sam 17:12) as to distinguish it from the Bethlehem of Zebulun (Josh 19:15). This would of course account for Matthew's addition of "in the land of Judah" to the verse (and his deletion of Ephratah is immaterial, since "Bethlehem" is retained).

John 7:42 provides some evidence, as well, that such a reading of Micah was likely current even among some of the Jews: "Has not the scripture said that the Christ comes from the descendants of David, and from Bethlehem, the village where David was?" The Jerusalem Talmud also records a tradition from rabbinic Jews of the Messiah's birth in Bethlehem (with the same tradition repeated in Lamentations Rabbah).

Regards,
Notsri
Notsri is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 12:20 PM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tampa,florida
Posts: 342
Default

somettimes it hurts to laugh so much...to listen to the folks here, they are essentially saying that almost every detail about Jesus in the Bible is completely wrong, can you imagine the difficulty, effort, and enormous undertaking to orchestrate such a complicated conspiracy as that?
mata leao is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 01:10 PM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mata leao
somettimes it hurts to laugh so much...to listen to the folks here, they are essentially saying that almost every detail about Jesus in the Bible is completely wrong, can you imagine the difficulty, effort, and enormous undertaking to orchestrate such a complicated conspiracy as that?
Almost no effort at all. Look at the stories that abound about King Arthur, Guinevere, Merlin, etc. in only 500 years.
Viti is offline  
Old 12-24-2005, 01:16 PM   #40
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: tampa,florida
Posts: 342
Default

Jesus is the most influential human who ever lived, king arthur,guinevere, and merlin mostly remain as children's fables. LOng after Lady Shea is dead, followers of Jesus will still be building Christian hospitals, orhpahanges, feeding centers and places of charity.
mata leao is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.