Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-20-2006, 06:23 AM | #321 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Your post bounces all over the place, so I will only reply to this snippet at this time;
Quote:
You may want to review post #124 (pg. 5) and (pg. 6)-#128 and #132 (by spin) and #135, 136, and 143. |
|
05-20-2006, 06:56 AM | #322 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Quote:
You are reading into the thread, and suggesting something that I have never stated nor even implied, that innocent children were slaughtered because; "They had it coming" My statement that you quoted above related ONLY to the whining participants in this thread. And as you employed the past tense, "They had it coming", your snide remark could not be applied to those posters, distorting the sense of my post. If you would address one subject at a time, you might find space to employ full paragraphs and not distort the positions and statements of others. |
||
05-20-2006, 08:34 AM | #323 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2006, 08:40 AM | #324 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Sheshbazzar
"Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar
"you're just pissed off with God". My first post in this thread lampooned the immaturity of the reasoning behind the previous posts, each of which in its own way was expressing a disaffection and contempt for the "gawd" of their misconceptions." We take "Gawd" as we find him,--in the bible and in the mouths of Christian persecutors of non-Christians. Would you by any chance be related to Belshazzar? |
05-20-2006, 08:56 AM | #325 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Sheshbazzar
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar
If any of the "compassionate", "humanitarian atheists", here would like to actually DO something constructive to help the welfare of their fellow man... The world's major charities are non-theistic, ie atheistic,-there are some overtly atheistic charities, and atheists like myself give to Christian Aid as an indirect atheist contribution, -as they have the infrastructure and distibution networks already set-up. The International and Ethical Union (IHEU), of which I am a member has affiliations with various charities. As your erroneous claim has hurt me deeply, please see below: http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/charity.htm and: http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/...0.htm#DONEGOOD |
05-20-2006, 09:33 AM | #326 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
|
Sheshbazzar
"Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar
What are you accusing The man from Galilee of, to claim that he is the most genocidal tyrant in history?" Look what he did to that innocent fig tree and those poor swines; but seriously, he set the standard for Christian intolerance ever since by his threats of hell fire and damnation to anyone who would not listen to him. Before him, the Jews merely slaughtered each other mostly ( if you don't count all the previous indigenous Canaanites. It took Christians to declare war on the whole world, and set an example to later Islamists. |
05-20-2006, 09:52 AM | #327 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
You arrived late in this thread, If you care to look back over the previous post, it will be evident that the post you quoted from me above, was in response to one of your fellow atheists stating that humanitarian assistance to the "suffer1ing" (a term invented by him), was in his opinion, as worthless and ineffective as "pissing into the wind".
These were the words of only one single individual posting here, other atheists have expressed more positive sentiments, and a more humanitarian outlook. No one needed take offense unless, THEY were also resistant donating to humanitarian causes. As the old proverb goes, If the shoe doesn't fit, why force your foot into it? but for them that it does fit, they wear it well. I appreciate and respect that this IS NOT the position and attitude of ALL atheists. ( else I would not have been found also been suggesting humanitarian donations to Papua New Guinea.) |
05-20-2006, 09:54 AM | #328 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2006, 10:30 AM | #329 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,931
|
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2006, 10:30 AM | #330 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
And in typical manner, you falsely represent what I said, by not telling the full story. Your save a dollar not drinking that diner coffee style humanitarian assistance is pissing into the wind. You need political commitment to relieve suffer1ing. As I said for every person Peter benefits with his aid, George does in a dozen. It seems though that the notion of "suffer1ing" has communicated something meaningful to you, given your usage of it. Good show. It's suffer1ing that we need to do away with, yet much suffer1ing is beyond the control or influence of the individuals, and certainly unnecessary for any passing gods who might have interest. It would of course be cruel, or indifferent to say the least, for such a god not to relieve any such suffer1ing had he or she the opportunity to do so. Such an entity needs nothing that humans can provide, nor can they benefit from the suffer1ing of others. If no-one benefits from unnecessary suffer1ing and the usually concommitent early death, then surely it should not happen, given a benevolent god in the vicinity. spin |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|