Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-28-2007, 09:55 AM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
|
Quote:
Until now there has never been a real picture of the character of Christ because the necessary and indispensable means were never applied. What can we say about Christ if we are not really acquainted with Judaism, if we have not made the distinction between prophetic and pharisaic Judaism, if we are not aware of the part played by the oral Torah, of the relation of the ammé haaretz to educated society? And above all, what can we say about Christ unless we are aware of mysticism and genius and the Doctrine of the Spiritual Elite and the Multitude (which alone can explain how the historical Christ has become the dogmatic Christ), unless we ourselves are free from superstition? |
|
05-28-2007, 10:06 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
|
05-28-2007, 04:34 PM | #23 | ||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-29-2007, 05:30 AM | #24 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: savannah, ga
Posts: 37
|
Christians hate Islam because they cannot admit they hate their own religion. We unbelievers should be more honest.
|
05-29-2007, 07:45 AM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
|
05-29-2007, 08:05 AM | #26 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,047
|
Quote:
Unbelievers should be wary of the latent Christian propaganda of destruction aimed at Islam (even if we are defending ourselves against the not so latent threat of Islamic Fundamentalism). The Christian schizophrenia vis a vis the other too monotheistic mafias has to be seen as such. Like Jerry Falwell, who was a strong supporter of Israel but convinced the Anti-Christ would be of Jewish birth. |
|
05-29-2007, 08:09 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
|
05-29-2007, 08:32 AM | #28 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,047
|
Quote:
The central teaching of a figure known to history as "Jesus of Nazareth" or the central teachings of the Christian Church which established itself in Rome eventually due to the ministry of Paul? Or somewhere in between, whether they be gnostics or other hereticized elements. The Central Dogma of the Romans was resurrection and salvation possible with belief in the Divinity of the Christos with some other less clear teachings about love and forgiveness thrown in as ornaments. (Of course, the central practice of the Romans was strict adhearance without debate to the Holy Mother Church up to and including complete trust in interpetation of scripture without the nuisance of reading any of it yourself, oh what a bother-reading.) The idea of any centrality of message among the Christians must reside in whoever is presuming the lesson-plan. And it's endless adapatability, a definite advantage it has institutionally, guarentees there is no clear answer to this question if posed amoung many of the differing sects of practicing christians- including the crack-pot christians (Jim Jones, David Koresh etc, they count too) |
|
05-29-2007, 08:37 AM | #29 | ||
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
|
[QUOTE=enoch007;4494208]
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-29-2007, 09:04 AM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 4,047
|
[QUOTE=Clouseau;4494227]
Quote:
Is not the cross the vehicle which sets the stage for the resurrection, which was the central point. Being crucified in First Century Judea does not, in and of itself, point to anything new or unique. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|