FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-11-2005, 08:08 AM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
These doubts about any specific Mythical Jesus proposal are increased by the number of mutually incompatible proposals of this type.
There are as many, if not more, incompatible proposals of a specific Historical Jesus but I don't see this same reasoning applied to doubt the more general assumption.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 09:38 AM   #52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 503
Default Meme War

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
There are as many, if not more, incompatible proposals of a specific Historical Jesus but I don't see this same reasoning applied to doubt the more general assumption.
The whole conflict about who Christ is or isn't can best be understood as a meme war. In order to propagate your particular meme, you have to choose a strategy. It seems, for a variety of reasons, good strategy to attack mythicism first, and later go after the various "Jesus God" memes.
freigeister is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 01:19 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
There are as many, if not more, incompatible proposals of a specific Historical Jesus but I don't see this same reasoning applied to doubt the more general assumption.
Obviously there will be differences in detail between different specific Mythical Jesus proposals, that isn't what I meant.

Using the title of this thread as an example, although neither Doherty nor Carotta believe in a Historical Jesus as ordinarily understood, their specific alternatives appear extremely dissimilar.

(Carotta's proposal may be a bad example because of the particularly sloppy scholarship involved, a better example might be comparing Doherty's proposal to that of Atwill.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 01:38 PM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan
There is simply nothing like NT studies anywhere else in western scholarship.
The world is a big place. Why not pursue the scholarly path as a joint-venture in one of the major non-christian cultures? India and China are chock-full of solid universities.
Wallener is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 01:46 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

I wonder whether the Scandinavian universities and/or journals would be receptive. (I know that they do publish in English.) And yes, I think it would be a fine idea for Michael Turton, for example, to publish his work in Chinese if he can. I also know that a lot of Russian scientists are highly skeptical of Western European ancient history and are capable in English.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 05-11-2005, 02:00 PM   #56
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
(Carotta's proposal may be a bad example because of the particularly sloppy scholarship involved, a better example might be comparing Doherty's proposal to that of Atwill.)

Andrew Criddle
"All honest scholars reach a point where they say: as far as my area of expertise is concerned the information is correct, but I cannot speak for the other areas involved. This, of course, allows the dishonest the opportunity to appear as if they know better and claim that everything rests on shaky foundations, giving overly cautious decision makers on historical and religious questions in the media an excuse for not touching that hot potato themselves, but leaving it to others." (from the Introduciton to 'Jesus was Caesar')

Apart from having studied philosophy and linguistics among other things Carotta speaks 10 languages fluently and has good proficiency in 10 more.
I'd really like to know who you people here think you are make judgements like the one above?
Juliana is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 03:12 PM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Speaking 10 languages (especially since most of them are modern) has nothing to do with how well your scholarship is.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 04:14 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliana
I'd really like to know who you people here think you are make judgements like the one above?
As Carotta has chosen to write a book for public consumption, as opposed to scholarly consideration, it would seem that any member of the public capable of reading it should be considered qualified to render a judgment.

Since Mr. Criddle is a published biblical scholar, that actually makes him overqualified.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 04:37 PM   #59
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
As Carotta has chosen to write a book for public consumption, as opposed to scholarly consideration, it would seem that any member of the public capable of reading it should be considered qualified to render a judgment.

Since Mr. Criddle is a published biblical scholar, that actually makes him overqualified.
Mr. Carotta has chosen to write a highly learned book which can be understood by the interested lay-person nevertheless. And different from many uninspiring books written for a small circle of adepts who consider themselves oh-so-prudent this one is written entertainingly at the same time. Few are able to do that, that is a sign of true education. But don't worry, it is scholarly enough, obviously it is too much already for wanna-be experts like our Vorkosigan (who doesn't even know Greek, how is one supposed to do serious NT-studies without mastership in that language? Why didn't he learn that language before he started messing around with Mark?). Much of the scholarly part is in the notes. Go ahead and read them if you can, they are online, before commenting on things you have no clue of.
Juliana is offline  
Old 05-11-2005, 06:12 PM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Apart from having studied philosophy and linguistics among other things Carotta speaks 10 languages fluently and has good proficiency in 10 more.
Hey, great, my wife speaks 14. Does that qualify her to write a book about Jesus? I mean, she knows as much about the scholarship as Carotta apparently does -- nil -- and speaks even more languages.

Quote:
I'd really like to know who you people here think you are make judgements like the one above?
I'm someone who took the time to interact with the scholarship -- unlike Carotta -- and focus strongly on methodology -- again unlike Carotta.

But you know, my entire book is online. Carotta is welcome to annihilate if he likes. The index page is at:

http://users2.ev1.net/~turton/GMark/GMark_index.html

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.