FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-03-2006, 04:46 AM   #231
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tallmadge, Ohio
Posts: 808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
On a semi-related note, do you think it unlikely that any messianic claimants/rebels would have deliberately taken on the name "Joshua" for the Scriptural significance?
I don't think that it's necessarily unlikely, but judging from the stories of the rebels in Josephus, such as Judas the Galilean, Theudas, etc., it does not appear that the various possible claimants bothered to do so.
jjramsey is offline  
Old 02-03-2006, 05:19 AM   #232
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Korea
Posts: 572
Default Probably Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
By whom? Paul? The gospellers? The earliest Christians?
Sorry to interject here. Gerd Ludemann makes no bones about Paul's deliberate misquotes from OT Lord - as in Lord of Hosts. He also arbitrarily assigns "God" or "Christ" as well.

Lord - 1 Cor. 1:31; but cf. Jer. 9:23-24
assigned to God - Rom. 11:34 from Isa. 40:13
assigned to Christ - 1 Cor. 2:16 from above Isa. 40:13

(from Paul, the Founder of Christianity)
knotted paragon is offline  
Old 02-03-2006, 08:13 AM   #233
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
By whom? Paul? The gospellers? The earliest Christians?
Whomever authored the "hymn" though, assuming Paul is repeating it, I supposed he may have had a different interpretation.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 11:00 AM   #234
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjramsey
It says that God "gave him the name that is above every name." It does not quite follow that the name in question is "Jesus," although that is one possibility, but the text is ambiguous here. "Lord" perhaps might be what Paul had in mind, especially since "Jesus" was a common name, while "Lord" is obviously grander. It's hard to tell. Also, if he only got the name "Jesus" after his resurrection, that would suggest either that he was nameless while taking human likeness (!) or that he had another name which is nowhere mentioned in the NT, unless you want to count "Immanuel," but I think we're all agreed that particular name is a late development. I think you are hinging way too much on an unclear verse.
IMHO there are enough references in Ancient Jewish and Christian writings to figures bearing mystical divine names (Metatron in Jewish writings for Christian writings see eg Revelation 19:11-16) for me to suspect that something similar underlies the passage in Philippians.

Andre Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.