FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-23-2004, 08:58 AM   #81
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Originally posted by Magus55
Nope, your sins are covered when you accept Jesus ( i.e you are no longer accountable for them). But on Earth, your body is still corrupt, as is the world, which is why you still sin. In Heaven, you get a incorruptible, immortal body. No more temptation, no corrupt body, a changed inner being found blameless through Jesus and wahla - made fit to be in Heaven with God.

Fantastic. So why can't he do the same for everybody in that case, if it's that easy for him to make us acceptable in his presence even if believer and non-believer alike are still "corrpupt" and still "sinning"?

Do you see God standing in the presence of sin right now?

You're the one who said "And I'd say no you aren't separated from God completely right now." So ask yourself that question.
Mageth is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:03 AM   #82
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
I meant by tangible, something that we can touch. A wooden box is tangible, love is not based on that definition.
Sin is intangible, love is intangible... And God didn't create either?
Mad Zur is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:10 AM   #83
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
The Word and the Holy Spirit tells us God's nature. And the flood isn't murder. Did God kill people? Yes. But there is a difference between killing and murder. And then again, since all life belongs to God in the first place, there is no reason he can't take it away just like he gave it.

And again, you are using a human made up definition of omnipotence to get as close as we can perceive to what it actually means. The Bible does not agree with the definition of anything imaginable, even the logically impossible. You are arbitrarily using a definition that you want to use, and saying if God doesn't meet your criteria, then He is a contradiction. God's nature is defined in the Bible, not in a dictionary.
I'm curious as to how the flood isn't murder. If I were to go and blow up a dam, and several hundred people died because of it, am I not murdering people? Or am I just killing them? In either case, what would be the difference?

What you seem to be saying is that it doesn't matter, because god gave us life, and can take it away. Would a mother have the same sort of latitude with her child? After all, she gave it life. Why shouldn't she be able to kill it? Or is the mother not held to the same standard as god?

As far words go, they are all human made up. And, while I'm sure Webster's isn't the last word on the subject of words, I certainly wouldn't call it arbitrary, unless you want to call every post you have ever made the same thing. And the Bible is exactly where I found his nature; it seems to be the only book that has that little story about the flood, and much else besides, in it.
case is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:20 AM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
[B]

Fantastic. So why can't he do the same for everybody in that case, if it's that easy for him to make us acceptable in his presence even if believer and non-believer alike are still "corrpupt" and still "sinning"?
Because the first step in the process is admitting that you're a sinner and are in need of a Savior. That begins the inner change. Un-believers won't do that, so they can't be made fit in God's eyes. They still carry sin. They can't be found blameless.


Quote:
You're the one who said "And I'd say no you aren't separated from God completely right now." So ask yourself that question.
God's power and sovereignty eminate (sp) through the universe, but God isn't actually standing on Earth. God can still follow His will and plan, making things happen on Earth and the Universe - but He isn't actually sitting in a bar doing it.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:21 AM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mad Zur
Sin is intangible, love is intangible... And God didn't create either?
God created love by being love. God can't and isn't sin, and therefore can't create it. He did however allow it to enter the world by creating free will.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:24 AM   #86
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
Default

You sure have to add a lot of special pleadings to make imperfect atheists different from imperfect Christians, don't you.

And all of them require your assumption that you KNOW God's plan.


It's remarkable! You really should call the Pope. I think he needs to talk to you...
Rhea is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:25 AM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Volva
Posts: 1,117
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
God created love by being love. God can't and isn't sin, and therefore can't create it. He did however allow it to enter the world by creating free will.
And you know this how?

atechnie
atechnie is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:27 AM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by case
I'm curious as to how the flood isn't murder. If I were to go and blow up a dam, and several hundred people died because of it, am I not murdering people? Or am I just killing them? In either case, what would be the difference?
Murder is unjustified and with malice. Killing isn't. God had a just reason to cause the flood and it wasn't done with malice.

Quote:
What you seem to be saying is that it doesn't matter, because god gave us life, and can take it away. Would a mother have the same sort of latitude with her child? After all, she gave it life. Why shouldn't she be able to kill it? Or is the mother not held to the same standard as god?
No the mother isn't held to the same standard because she isn't perfect or supreme. And God governs all life. God gave life to everything in creation. God created the ability for life to exist. God allowed the mother to be a vessel to create life. God created humans in His image. God is the supreme ruler over life, not the mother.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:28 AM   #89
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by atechnie
And you know this how?

atechnie
The Bible and the Holy Spirit.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 09:29 AM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rhea
You sure have to add a lot of special pleadings to make imperfect atheists different from imperfect Christians, don't you.

And all of them require your assumption that you KNOW God's plan.


It's remarkable! You really should call the Pope. I think he needs to talk to you...
Yes I do know God's plan because He told it to us. And Guess what, you know His plan too!
Magus55 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.