FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-23-2004, 08:12 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Apparently, Joel Marcus, opines the same thing:



He also raises a few other instances of errors.
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 08:18 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Also, with this from Marcus, I add in this from Sanders and Davies:

Quote:
"One last prefatory remark is required: the use of this text assumes that the evangelists did not rewrite their material entirely, so as to make it all harmonious with their own views (see above, 'redaction Criticism', p. 202). Luckily, this assumption will prove to be true. The assumption may surprise the reader, whose intuition may be that an author of strong views would recast all the material to agree with them. There are two points to be observed: (1) Imposing a completely consistent view on diverse sources is in fact quite hard. Modern academic work will provide a lot of examples. Those of us who read doctoral theses spend spend a fair part of our time checking for consistency from one part to another, but perfect consistency is nevertheless often not obtained. The problem of consistency of of course less acute in a short work than in a long one, and the gospels are short. Despite this, not one of them is perfectly consistent [John possibly the closest]. This leads us to our second point. (2) Ancient writers not infrequently incorporated their sources whole, or only slightly edited, with the result that the final work contains glaring inconsistencies and even contradictions. The ancients seem to have been less troubled by inconsistency that moderns are, and what strikes us as a blatant internal disagreement may have been viewed in some other light by the original author and readers." (Studying the Synoptic Gospels, Sanders and Davies, p. 305)"
Mark could, simply be trying to fit pre-Markan, localized traditions into his itinerary which is certainly not a strict, straightforward history. The itinery in Mark is largely theological.

The geography error(s) appear to be overpreessed.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 08:42 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

Marcus mentioned 10:1 as an error as well? Is there something in the Greek I can't see?


If you have a map, follow along:

Jesus goes from Capernaum (Mark 9:33 which is in Galilee right off the NE portion of the Sea of Galilee) to the region of Judea (Mark 10:1).

1Jesus then left that place and went into the region of Judea

Now Judea was a big region. Did Mark mean "Judea" as in the area on the map near Jerusalem, bethany and Bethlehem, or did Mark mean the "province of Judea" which covers the whole area?

At any rate, Mark then has Jesus cross the Jordan (10:1b) into, again the Decapolis or possibly PEREA (depending on how far into "Judea" they were), to miff a few Pharisees and then finally they go to Jerusalem (10:32) which is all the way back across the Jordan.

Maybe there is something on ancient roads I am missing? Where is the error on Geography? Mark has Jesus traveling around, covering some of the same ground a few times but I'm not sure how this can be pressed as an error?

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 07:49 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default Mk 7:31

Has anyone who spouts about Mk 7:31 actually looked at the Greek of the text?? They might find that the AV is actually closer to the mark. Other translations seem to be based solely on the Vulgate.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 03-23-2004, 10:43 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Yuri Kuchinsky has an article on Mark 7:31.

The Westcott-Hort reading ("he went out from the borders of Tyre, and came through Sidon unto the sea of Galilee") is supported by Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Bezae, 019, 037, 038, 33, 565, 700, 892, and some versions (including the Vulgate but also the Ethiopic and some Coptic manuscripts).

The Textus Receptus reading ("he went out from the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and came to the sea of Galilee") is supported by p45, Alexandrinus, 017, 032, 033, 041, 0131, 28, 1009, 1010, 1071, 1079, 1195, 1216, 1230, 1241, 1242, 1253, 1344, 1365, 1546, 1646, 2148, 2174, and some versions.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 03-24-2004, 08:12 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

I can't find anything. Someone please explain how Mark 10:1 is an error.

"As they approached Jerusalem and came to Bethphage and Bethany at the Mount of Olives"

Where is Bethpage? I can't find it?

Lets go back to what I wrote earlier:

Quote:
you have a map, follow along:

Jesus goes from Capernaum (Mark 9:33 which is in Galilee right off the NE portion of the Sea of Galilee) to the region of Judea (Mark 10:1).

1Jesus then left that place and went into the region of Judea

Now Judea was a big region. Did Mark mean "Judea" as in the area on the map near Jerusalem, bethany and Bethlehem, or did Mark mean the "province of Judea" which covers the whole area?

At any rate, Mark then has Jesus cross the Jordan (10:1b) into, again the Decapolis or possibly PEREA (depending on how far into "Judea" they were), to miff a few Pharisees and then finally they go to Jerusalem (10:32) which is all the way back across the Jordan.

Maybe there is something on ancient roads I am missing? Where is the error on Geography? Mark has Jesus traveling around, covering some of the same ground a few times but I'm not sure how this can be pressed as an error?
Now look at this Map taken from V 1 of Meier's Marginal Jew series at 434:



He actually has "major roads" but they don't come out in the Amazon online version so I added in where a major road is said to have been.

Assume Jesus is in Capernaum (up in Galileee). he goes down into the region of Judea (how far we know not but presumably far--se below). he goes into the Decapolis or Perea.

Look at the map and read this statement:

"As they approached Jerusalem and came to [Bethphage and] Bethany"

That is an accurate statement. The road leads right into Bethany before Jerusalem.

Thus, Mark may very well be reflecting accurate Palestininain geography here.

Anybody on this board know how 10:1 is supposed to be an error?

Even if Jesus went into the Decapolis and not Perea there is another road (dotted line on Meier's map) leading down into this one on the eastern border of Judea (the Province) where Jesus and co. would have crossed back over the Jordan.

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-24-2004, 06:48 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

From the site Kirby linked, I noticed this as the bottom:

Mark 8:22-26: The pericopae of the healing of the blind man was mentioned by Mark to have occured at Bethsaida, which he referred to as a "village". But it is well known that Bethsaida during the time of Jesus was a large and prosperous town.[9]

Does anyone have any information on Bethsaida from the first century? What documents this?

The article quote Mark 10:1:

Quote:
Mark 10:1: Jesus is supposed to have gone from Capernaum to the territory of Judea and "across the Jordan" river. As the reader can see by looking at the map, the statement by Mark is geographically problematic. Firstly, none of Judea is to the east of Jordan (which would be what "across the Jordan" from Capernaum would mean). Secondly, to get from Capernaum to Judea, Jesus would have had to cross the Jordon twice (avoiding the traditionally antagonistic Samaritans) or not at all (directly southwards through Samaria). The passage implies a single crossing, leading him nowhere.[10]
My questiuon here is, does Mark say they went to Judea by crossing the Jordan or does Mark say they went into Judea and crossed the Jordan.

The NIV leads me to think that Mark 10:1 says they went to Judea and then across the Jordan. This touches on the alleged error in Mark 11:1:

Quote:
Mark 11:1: The passage has Jesus travelling from Jericho (Mark 10:46) via Bethpage and Bethany when it should have been in reverse order. We treat this particular error in more detail elsewhere.
Now if Mark is on the road I suggested above, he wopuld hit Jerico, then Bethany, then Jerusalem, just as Mark had it:



Link to translations:

http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/...nguage=english

Can someonme fluent in Greek tell me what the post interpretation of Mark 10:1 is. Can is be Mark went into Judea and then across the Jordan. This makes sense since the rest of Mark's Journey seems like it follows that main road I posted an image of.

But if it says Jesus went into Judea from Capernaum by crossing the Hordan Mark is ridiculously screwed up.

So Greek people, I ask for your assistance?

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-24-2004, 08:32 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

as an FYI, the line I drew on the map is slightly off. The road goes directly through Jericho on Meier's version.
Vinnie is offline  
Old 03-24-2004, 09:02 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Here is a good map for the roads:

First Century Palestine

Here is one with less clutter:

Map of Israel

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 03-24-2004, 09:28 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
Default

First one is a great map

It calls Gadara the cultural center of the Decapolis. Is it possibly Mark confused Gadara with Geresa?

Vinnie
Vinnie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.