FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2008, 04:11 PM   #61
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Where his position becomes dogmatic is in his refusal to even consider the idea that there might be a historical root to one or more of these characters, insisting instead that they must be works of abject fiction.
You have it wrong here. I have NEVER refused to consider the idea that there might be an historical root to any of the NT characters. I did believe, at one time, that all the main characters including Jesus, Peter and "Paul" were really on earth in the 1st century.

It is the evidence or lack of evidence in the 1st century of these characters that have led me to conclude that these NT characters were fabricated to distort history and mis-lead people into thinking that a God was on earth in the 1st century.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:35 PM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly View Post
Well, you seem to completely reject any and all statements coming from the people who witnessed that they actually met him in person,
There are no such witnesses. None of the authors of the NT ever even claim to be eyewitnesses, and if they did, we would know they were lying.

The author of Acts - generally thought to have also authored Luke - explicitly tells us his information was handed down to him.
spamandham is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 09:07 PM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly View Post
Well, you seem to completely reject any and all statements coming from the people who witnessed that they actually met him in person
Like who?

Name one Christian writer who states, explicitly, that he met Jesus in the flesh.

Failing that, you may offer an implicit declaration to that effect, and then we can discuss its credibility.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:01 PM   #64
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
]I cannot find any evidence for Jesus, it is reasonable to claim he did not exist, as soon as evidence is found, I will change to reflect the evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly View Post
Well, you seem to completely reject any and all statements coming from the people who witnessed that they actually met him in person, and since there were no video cameras back in those days, I simply do not know what sort of evidence you would find satisfactory. Jesus does not seem to be walking the planet today, so faith, belief and personal spiritual experience are the only supportive evidence that there is, and unfortunately none of those things come with the kind of empirical justifications you would accept.
I am looking for information external of apologetic sources. I have found two passages with the words "Jesus and Christ" but they seem to be forgeries or not written by Josephus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly View Post
I personally think the Book of John is the most consistant and reliable work. I have questions about the synoptic gospels too and have very little faith in anything supposedly composed by Paul.
So what made you think the Book of John is reliable? I cannot find anything reliable in all the Gospels. Tell me what specifically is reliable about the Book of John.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelly View Post
You might, however, consider the Book of Revelations as at least some proof that something was certainly going on among the early Christians. One can hardly look at the apparent move towards a one world government based on New World Order concepts without wondering if the prophesies of John the Divine aren't actually coming true. His apocalyptic "last days" visions, by the way, do not appear to have originated with either the Jews of the OT or the Christians. The "last days" prophesies actually seem to originate in the much older texts from the Rig Veda and the Hindu concepts that earth repeatedly goes through a "Kali Yuga" where death and destruction come about. They attribute this phenomenon to the god Shiva, who was also known as Indra and Rudra who was the apparant father of Aryan elitist concepts. The stories those texts appear to be based upon are far more ancient that the Old Testament tales, or even the Babylonian or Sumerian texts, and have apparently influenced religious concepts for thousands and thousands of years. And periodic destructions do apparently indeed occur. For instance, the earth has been through at least 17 different ice ages (and their respective global warming events) according to the climatologists. And god only knows how many religious wars have taken place.
I consider the book of Revelation to be incoherent.

But perhaps "Paul" did read this book and then decided to write to SEVEN CHURCHES.

Revelation 1.20
Quote:
....The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
Did "Paul" get the revelation to write to SEVEN CHURCHES from Revelations?
  1. Romans
  2. Corinthians
  3. Galatians
  4. Ephesians
  5. Phililippians
  6. Thesalonians
  7. Colossians
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.