FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2012, 12:11 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
A typical kabbalistic exposition involving yesh (= 310) being equal to God (= 31)

Where is this light stored? Proverbs 8:21 says:


My loved ones will inherit from there and I will fill their storehouses. אהבי יש ואצרתיהם אמל להנחיל


The Shaarey Orah reveals to us the key word is ‘there’ – Yesh – יש which has the value of 310 and refers to 310 storehouses of reward in the world to come and a tithe in this world. The Torah states that one should give a 1/10th of what one earns to charity. Hashem in his kindness tithes from the good stored up for us. G-d’s Name EL - אל, gematria 31, associates with the sefirah of Hesed – kindness. This is 1/10th of Yesh.[1769] The word Yesh associates with the presence of G-d, i.e. the ultimate reward:


וייכץ יעקב משנתו ויאמר אכן יש השם במקום הזה ואנכי לא ידעתי
And Jacob awoke from his sleep and said truly there is Hashem in this place and I knew it not.
(Genesis 28:16)


The Hebrew word Yesh appears superlative since a better translation would read, “And Jacob awoke from his sleep and said truly Hashem is in this place and I knew it not.” Yesh is providing an additional emphatic thought. Yesh refers to something else that is stored away for us and experienced only fleetingly in our world. ‘Yesh Hashem – There’s Hashem’ is the highest reward in the world to come.

The 310 storehouses are said to have 310 guards in the world of Gevurah that prevent the bounty from descending.[1770] These guards were put in place because of doubt expressed by the Israelites in the desert:


Text ‎19-2: There are 310 Storehouses

Is there Hashem close to us or not? היש השם בקרבנו אם-אין


And the name of the place was called Massah-trying, and Meribah-strive,
because of the striving of the children of Israel,
and because they tried the Lord saying:
‘Is the Lord among us, or not?’
(Exodus 17:7)

HaYesh YHVH in our midst or AYN
It is a joy to read your posts.
Iskander is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 12:13 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The concept of Yesh is at the heart of the most fundamental Jewish concept - the creation out of nothing

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayin_and_Yesh
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 12:25 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

No one speaks up for the tradition that Jesus was a divine hypostasis. I think it was original. Justin puzzles me. I am not convinced that Against Marcion was originally written against Marcion. I think Tertullian took a treatise FOR the idea that Jesus was the witnessed by the divine scriptures systematically reworked by Irenaeus and then Tertullian into an argument against Marcion (notice the text behind Book Three was reworked by Tertullian “against the Jews”; the same thing is present in Book Five)

I don't thinkthe historical Justin was that far removed from Marcion
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 01:25 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Another important mystical source text:

Quote:
That I may cause those that love me to inherit substance (= yesh) and I will fill their treasures (Proverbs 8:21)

לְהַנְחִ֖יל אֹהֲבַ֥י יֵ֑שׁ וְאֹצְרֹ֖תֵיהֶ֣ם אֲמַלֵּֽא

literally "to endow love, wealth (= יֵ֑שׁ) their treasuries I will fill"
This is fundamental to Alexandrian Christianity:

Quote:
ἵνα μερίσω τοῖς ἐμὲ ἀγαπῶσιν ὕπαρξιν καὶ τοὺς θησαυροὺς αὐτῶν ἐμπλήσω ἀγαθῶν ἐὰν ἀναγγείλω ὑμῖν τὰ καθ’ ἡμέραν γινόμενα μνημονεύσω τὰ ἐξ αἰῶνος ἀριθμῆσαι

I walk in ways of righteousness, and [am] conversant with the paths of judgement; that I may divide substance to them that love me, and may fill their treasures with good things. If I declare to you the things that daily happen, I will remember [also] to recount the things of old.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 01:59 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The show me state
Posts: 324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
The concept of Yesh is at the heart of the most fundamental Jewish concept - the creation out of nothing

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayin_and_Yesh
Yesh not.
DiamondH is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 02:19 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Another important mystic idea from Philo explained:

Quote:
And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden and there (שָׁם) he put the man whom he had formed (Gen 2:8)
Philo equates the Logos with topos. He must be identifying yesh as the Logos (= Jesus).
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:23 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Philo clearly believes the Logos is here in one of words of Genesis 2:8. From Allegorical Interpretation 1

XIV. (43) "And God planted a paradise in Eden, in the east: and there he placed the man whom he had Formed:"{8}{#ge 2:8.} for he called that divine and heavenly wisdom by many names; and he made it manifest that it had many appellations; for he called it the beginning, and the image, and the sight of God. And now he exhibits the wisdom which is conversant about the things of the earth (as being an imitation of this archetypal wisdom), in the plantation of this Paradise.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:29 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

From the Wikipedia page on Philo view of God (I'm just trying to nail down the ultimate proof that Philo knew yesh (“there”) = the Logos

Similarly God cannot exist or change in space. He has no "where" (πού, obtained by changing the accent in Gen. iii. 9: "Adam, where [ποῡ] art thou?"), is not in any place. He is Himself the place; the dwelling-place of God means the same as God Himself, as in the Mishnah = "God is" (comp. Freudenthal, "Hellenistische Studien," p.*73), corresponding to the tenet of Greek philosophy that the existence of all things is summed up in God.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:37 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The ultimate proof was sitting right in front of my eyes in what followed my last citation from Allegorical Interpretation 1:

For let not such impiety ever occupy our thoughts as for us to suppose that God cultivates the land and plants paradises, since if we were to do so, we should be presently raising the question of why he does so: for it could not be that he might provide himself with pleasant places of recreation and pastime, or with amusement. (44) Let not such fabulous nonsense ever enter our minds; for even the whole world would not be a worthy place or habitation for God, since he is a place to himself, and he himself is full of himself, and he himself is sufficient for himself, filling up and surrounding everything else which is deficient in any respect, or deserted, or empty; but he himself is surrounded by nothing else, as being himself one and the universe. (45) God therefore sows and implants terrestrial virtue in the human race, being an imitation and representation of the heavenly virtue. For, pitying our race, and seeing that it is exposed to abundant and innumerable evils, he firmly planted terrestrial virtue as an assistant against and warderoff of the diseases of the soul; being, as I have said before, an imitation of the heavenly and archetypal wisdom which he calls by various names. Now virtue is called a paradise metaphorically, and the appropriate place for the paradise is Eden; and this means luxury: and the most appropriate field for virtue is peace, and ease, and joy; in which real luxury especially consists. (46) Moreover, the plantation of this paradise is represented in the east; for right reason never sets, and is never extinguished, but it is its nature to be always rising. And as I imagine, the rising sun fills the darkness of the air with light, so also does virtue when it has arisen in the soul, irradiate its mist and dissipate the dense darkness. (47) "And there," says Moses, "he placed the man whom he had formed:" for God being good, and having formed our race for virtue, as his work which was most akin to himself, places the mind in virtue, evidently in order that it, like a good husband, may cultivate and attend to nothing else except virtue

Look at the way Philo cites the passage - “and there” = the Logos. In Hebrew this is sham. There have been books and articles written about Philo's identification of “place” (= “there”) as the logos. No one has ever made the connection with yesh. Too few Jews with any real knowledge of their tradition reading Philo
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-28-2012, 04:04 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

The difficulty of course is how do you connect yesh with sham. They both mean 'there' but still.
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.