Y.B

<removed>

_Naturalist_

Eh... what?

I'm not even convinced that he existed! And even if he did, why must I be completely for or completely against? Why can't I agree with some things he said and not others? Or is that too complex for you?

Are you suggesting that it's impossible to lie sometimes and tell the truth sometimes?

Who said I was?

Do you even know what you're talking about, or what you're trying to say?

Evidence, please. Oh, I forgot, you don't have any.

Alf

The point is that it is IRRELEVANT.

Even if I agree with for example the golden rule. and thus are "FOR" what Christ supposedly said. I am not agreeing that I am For Christ since I am not convinced that a real living Jesus actually said those words. The only evidence we have that he at all said those things are in the bible and the bible is not acceptable as eevidence to me since it is so incoherent and contradictory. So even if I agree with the golden rule it does not mean that I am "for Christ" since I am not sure that Christ at all said the golden rule.

Your assertions misses the point.

Alf

Alf

I second that. Starting from now I won't respond to any posting Sallieri post.

He had his chance, we have asked for evidence, we have asked for proof and he never bothered to provide any. Not even in a thread he recently starting with the title "Proof of God's existence". Even in that first post he didn't post a single piece of evidence.

I have previously asked him to provide such proof - an excelltn proof would be if he could tell me what project I am working on at work. There is no way he can know that unless his God told him.

Unfortunately, either his God refused to provide him with such an excellent proof (thus, his God is evil and refuse to allow Sallieri to prove himself right), he got the evidence from his God but he refused to let it on and thus wrecking his own stance (not very likely - I am sure he would post it proudly if he had hard evidence that his God exist) or there is no such God. Personally, I am willing to bet on the last alternative.

<removed>

Alf

Jedi Mind Trick

I only hope that he will see the truth of Iluvatar.

<removed>

Y.B

<removed> I must give Tolkien's Holy Book another read in the future to become a better believer.

Hedshaker

I agreee :thumbs:

<removed>

Orbit

Jim Lazarus

You don't listen do you? Not only this, but it's clear you have no clue as to what you're actually talking about. Just as pointed out by Jack:

First, you assume that we all accept the Bible as an accurate record of what Jesus said and did. Many of us do not believe that this is true, and thus yes - we can and do hold indifference. What evidence do you have that we should in fact hold the biblical record as an accurate one?

Besides this, your entire point is childish in the first place. In what way does this contribute to the "Existence of God" forum, which you originally posted this in? Simply, it is another futile attack against atheists themselves because you have no evidence to argue against our position.

I'm starting to miss Blark and Theophilus, considering this guy.

- Laz

Corona688

Have we defeated you in debate so soundly that you are forced to flee and pretend it never happened? I await your response to me here with bated breath.

Aaron Thrash

Look, Salieri, your attempts at flaming and forcing us to choose whether we are on the side of an imaginary character or against it, is getting old. THERE IS NO CHRIST, OR GOD THEY DON"T EXIST, with that said, I can not be on the side for or against that which does not exist.

I am against the lie perpetrated by christians, so I guess you could say I'm against christians if you like, but only those like yourself who continue to berate us with their imagination. Please stop.

<removed>

-A