FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2006, 05:31 AM   #511
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Does anyone put forward a founder of rabbinic judaism? It can be understood as a solution to a problem - how can we worship without a temple or if we are not near the temple. Why not see xianity in the same light, we need a messiah, Ok, let's make one up!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 07:57 AM   #512
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D
Are you suggesting there's something wrong with people saying what they think?
I am saying that there is something wrong in the way mythicists portray their opponents as unscientific fideists. This is akin to the way clerics treated their opponents as dangerous heretics.
No Robots is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:02 AM   #513
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots
I am saying that there is something wrong in the way mythicists portray their opponents as unscientific fideists. This is akin to the way clerics treated their opponents as dangerous heretics.
Might that be due to the fact that the basic assumption - quoted a billion times a day - is hj?

If someone is hjist and atheist do they not have a duty to have very clear and cogent arguments - not dependent on apologia? It ain't a neutral matter!

And which model hj are they defending?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:12 AM   #514
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Might that be due to the fact that the basic assumption - quoted a billion times a day - is hj?

If someone is hjist and atheist do they not have a duty to have very clear and cogent arguments - not dependent on apologia? It ain't a neutral matter!

And which model hj are they defending?
Mythicists, then, should be seen as providing an opportunity to HJers to really sharpen their arguments. So instead of trying to get MJers to buy into Brunner, I should market Brunner as the only real defense against MJ. I had thought about this approach before, but I need MJ to become more of a problem for the mainstream. Maybe Tabor's recent debacle marks the turning of the worm.
No Robots is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:27 AM   #515
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

when will this server work?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:31 AM   #516
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Is Brunner a reaction to a Nietzchean (sp) superman?

Does not his jesus make more sense as a superhero? A theme in Batman is his dark side - why is he hiding his identity?

Taoism is an ancient approach to what is to be done about the interplay of good and evil - why not argue it is circular and interrelated?

I am reminded of a song - godspell, jc superstar (?), is he a man?

gods in druidic times were larger than life (might goliath have been a god?)

When I hear hero stories the presumption has to be - another god - imaginary hero, fiction.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:50 AM   #517
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Is Brunner a reaction to a Nietzchean (sp) superman?
Totally. Some of the stuff he has to say about Nietzsche is hilarious. His step-daughter wrote an essay contrasting them.

Quote:
Does not his jesus make more sense as a superhero?
That's his point, that Christ is the head of a kind of spiritual super-elite.

Quote:
A theme in Batman is his dark side - why is he hiding his identity?
Yeah. I love the way Brunner deals with Christ's dark side, his anger and hate.

Quote:
Taoism is an ancient approach to what is to be done about the interplay of good and evil - why not argue it is circular and interrelated?
Yup. This is quite explicit in Brunner's work.

Quote:
I am reminded of a song - godspell, jc superstar (?), is he a man?
Yeah, but what a man!

Quote:
When I hear hero stories the presumption has to be - another god - imaginary hero, fiction.
Brunner was writing for our time, a time when we've come to sicken of our own imagination.
No Robots is offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 11:13 AM   #518
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D
If you posit this as a model for explaining the origin of Christianity, you still have to explain the prior existence of a group of which these people were members, and which shared an emotionally charged setting.
What else is needed to explain the existence of a group of like-minded individuals reconsidering traditional messianic expectations besides recognizing that this activity was apparently quite common at the time?

Quote:
Do you know of any instances of a religious movement starting in this way?
It would seem to fit the group that produced the reinterpretation of traditional messianic expectations found in the DSS but I think it is a red herring to suggest that other examples are needed when there is apparently nothing unreasonable or unlikely about the suggestion I've offered.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 03:09 AM   #519
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
You and I may be agreed as to whether there were supernatural events, but there are many who beleive them as real as anything you can name. Some of them would like to impose behavioral standards which you and I might find too restrictive.
True. But what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?
J-D is offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 03:44 AM   #520
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
OK, you got me there, but isn't that a bit circular?
I don't see the circularity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
Any other benefit to a non-miraculous Jesus?
How does 'benefit' come into it, and how does it make any difference to my point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
Is not Paul the more powerful figure, taking an unremarkable cult following and building a religion out of it? He must be up there with David Koresh and Jim Jones.
Maybe. How does that make any difference to my point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
The OP was about the turning point to MJ and I answered that. I've stayed with the thread and tried to respond and discuss, since that's the polite thing to do. And I didn't state in that post that I didn't care, but did ask why I should. It's simply a question designed to return some response I haven't yet heard or considered. No Robots finds it necessary to counter the MJ case, finding a historical Jesus to be necessary in some sense, although he agrees the miracles did not occur. Had I just shrugged my shoulders and left the thread, I've have never known ther could be such a person as a Christian Atheist as No Robots claims to be.
Well, in that case, if you think it's worth discussing whether or not there was a historical Jesus, isn't the suggestion of a possible reason for thinking there was of some interest?
J-D is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.