FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2012, 03:38 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
It is more than possible that the Bible has had a shaming and civilising effect on most of the world.
I think that's a matter of opinion.
Not entirely.
Entirely a matter of opinion.
Among the uninformed, yes.

Well this reverts to the classification of the biblical historians and the ancient historians as insiders and outsiders. The biblical historians have the inside information on the mysterious historical origins of their church.
The concept of Christian monarchy, crystallised in 'Christian' oaths, sworn by monarchs at coronation services, under the authority of mitred 'bishops', is a very long-standing one that has not entirely vanished, even now. One coronation oath was even televised and broadcast, and virtually the whole British population listened to that oath, either on television or radio. There's no privileged information here.

'Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel?'

http://www.royal.gov.uk/ImagesandBro...2June1953.aspx

Now this question is an echo that goes back many centuries, not just in England, but in the whole of Europe. It has therefore been carried to many colonised regions of the world. It even has resonance in the statutes of the USA, that reckons to separate church and state. It is very arguable that the moral strictures of Islam are consequent on perceived authority of the Bible. It is therefore more than possible that the Bible has had a shaming and civilising effect on most of the world.

Quote:
Such were the compelling logistics of imperially sponsored centralised state monotheistic holy writs in antiquity.
Wholly antichrist writs.

As anyone who has read the Letter to the Hebrews is aware.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 06:30 AM   #42
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Constantine didn't have to do anything. He elevated an obscure cult because his mother was a convert. If Helena had been a Mithraist, then Mithraism would be the dominant world religion right now.

Like I've told you before, Christianity won a lottery not a debate.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 06:42 AM   #43
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Constantine didn't have to do anything. He elevated an obscure cult because his mother was a convert. If Helena had been a Mithraist, then Mithraism would be the dominant world religion right now.

Like I've told you before, Christianity won a lottery not a debate.
Killing people for God is NOT winning a lotto.

Against the Galilleans
Quote:
....you emulate the rages and the bitterness of the Jews, overturning temples and altars, and you slaughtered not only those of us who remained true to the teachings of their fathers, but also men who were as much astray as yourselves, heretics, because they did not wail over the corpse in the same fashion as yourselves...
aa5874 is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 11:47 AM   #44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Constantine didn't have to do anything. He elevated an obscure cult because his mother was a convert. If Helena had been a Mithraist, then Mithraism would be the dominant world religion right now.
Since women could not be Mithraists the above is a little unlikely.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 06-19-2012, 12:41 PM   #45
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Constantine didn't have to do anything. He elevated an obscure cult because his mother was a convert. If Helena had been a Mithraist, then Mithraism would be the dominant world religion right now.
Since women could not be Mithraists the above is a little unlikely.

Andrew Criddle
Cybelian then. Smart ass. :redface:
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 12:08 AM   #46
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Constantine didn't have to do anything. He elevated an obscure cult because his mother was a convert.

The evidence behind the legend that Helena was a christian convert is not what you'd call compelling.


Quote:
Like I've told you before, Christianity won a lottery not a debate.
Who sold the lottery tickets? Who collected the payments? Who advertised a free lottery leading up to Nicaea? Was it a free lottery? Do we know who entered the lottery? Do we know how the winner was selected? Do we know the process behind the machinery of the emperor's final decision? Really?

What happened to the other lottery entrants such as the Asclepians?

Some lottery entrants were apparently publically executed.

This does not sound at all like a lottery to me.

Do you seriously believe this Helena was a christian and the christians won the lottery shit?

Do you believe Helena found the 300 year old Cross and Nails?

Do you believe in the propaganda of the heresiological victors?

I dont.
mountainman is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 07:46 AM   #47
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Yes, I think Helena was a convert (if not a born Christian) and Constantine (who I believe was himself indifferent to the religion) and passed the Edict of Milan to please her.

Of course I do not believe she found relics. I think she got hustled by the locals.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 08:25 AM   #48
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Yes, I think Helena was a convert (if not a born Christian) and Constantine (who I believe was himself indifferent to the religion) and passed the Edict of Milan to please her.

Of course I do not believe she found relics. I think she got hustled by the locals.
You mean the locals were suicidal?? Who would "hustle" the Emperor's mother??

You must mean the locals got hustled and not only the locals but indeed the people of the Roman Empire.

Up to now, you are still attempting to convince people that the Jesus character in the Bible of the time of Constantine is a product of history and was NOT hustled.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 02:48 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conowingo, Maryland
Posts: 577
Default

Thank you all so much for your feedback. The debate has concluded and it looks like (via the voters) that I have won the debate.
DoubtingDave is offline  
Old 06-20-2012, 03:09 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShockOfAtheism View Post
Thank you all so much for your feedback. The debate has concluded and it looks like (via the voters) that I have won the debate.
Winning of a religious debate by votes is not usually much of a victory.
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.