FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2004, 02:01 AM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sven
It was a simple circle. And she had to take the number in the basis of 11 instead of 10 (if my memory serves me correctly). The idea was great (to hid a circle in pi) but you're right: this suggest some greater being behind the cosmos - although Sagan probably wasn't thinking about the Christian God
<geek>
I don't think it was touched on much in the movie, but the premise was that, as advanced and old as the aliens were who sent us the plans to make this wormhole traveling machine, the subway system itself, and the circle hidden in Pi, were in place long before they matured as a species. I think it was more of a play on Clarke's saying, that a technology sufficiently advanced will look like magic to a lesser civilization. So what if they created the universe, their god status is only in our perspective.
</geek>
Rhaedas is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 03:35 AM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 217
Default Why Are Numbers so Irrational?

Quote:
SLD wrote:
It brings up an interesting mathematical philosophy question: given an irrational number such as Pi ..., isn't it likely that every possible arrangement of numbers is inevitable at some point in it's decimal expansion?
No, not really. Consider this irrational number:
.10110111011110111110111111...

Lots of possible combinations will never show up in it.


Greg
gagster is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 06:13 AM   #53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

The way I see it, the media is representing this as literal history. I remember seeing Lee Strobel on TV talking about how this is huge evangelical opportunity

Although, there was a show "The Last Days of Christ" last Friday, if I remember correctly. I've seen Crossan and Paula Frederiksen among others, talking about the historicity of the trial (Sanhedrin would not meet at night, ruthless Pilate would never allow mob to influence his decisions....) I was pretty satisfied with the show.
Roller is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 06:47 AM   #54
SLD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
Default Re: Why Are Numbers so Irrational?

Quote:
Originally posted by gagster
No, not really. Consider this irrational number:
.10110111011110111110111111...

Lots of possible combinations will never show up in it.


Greg
No. You haven't defined an irrational number. An irrational number is something such as Pi, e, Square Root of 2, Square Root of 7, etc. Even if you did define one in base 2, then still all possible combinations show up, just in base 2.

SLD
SLD is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 06:58 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roller
Although, there was a show "The Last Days of Christ" last Friday, if I remember correctly. I've seen Crossan and Paula Frederiksen among others, talking about the historicity of the trial (Sanhedrin would not meet at night, ruthless Pilate would never allow mob to influence his decisions....) I was pretty satisfied with the show.
I agree. They did a pretty good job of pointing out the more obvious historical inaccuracies.

Crossan, however, has to stop telling his barber he wants the "Spock look".
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 07:06 AM   #56
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default Re: Re: Why Are Numbers so Irrational?

Quote:
Originally posted by SLD
No. You haven't defined an irrational number. An irrational number is something such as Pi, e, Square Root of 2, Square Root of 7, etc. Even if you did define one in base 2, then still all possible combinations show up, just in base 2.
SLD
Of course .10110111011110111110111111... is an irrational number. Any number which can not be written as a fraction is irrational by definition. If you think that the above is not irrational, please provide the corresponding fraction. As an aside, gagster nowhere claimed that this number is in base 2. A real number doesn't "need" to exploit all digits from 0 to 9 to be a real number.

I see I have to retract my earlier statement that I agree with you that a circle would inevitable show up in pi, only provided one searches long enough. The number above is a good counter to the claim that every sequence of numbers will eventually show up in any irrational number.
Sven is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 07:07 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bede
Sven,

Just out of interest, Contact is a pro-atheism movie that is not scientifically accurate (although might appear so to the untrained eye) and very emotional. If you haven't seen it, do so.

B
You're missing the point.

'Contact' has always been marketed as science fiction. No-one has claimed that it is science fact.

This 'Passion' film, on the other hand, is being lauded as an accurate portrayal of history - which is a joke for people who either know the Biblical accounts in detail or who know Mel Gibson's ideas of 'historical accuracy in filmmaking'.

Unfortunately there are those gullible people who will believe the 'historical' hype and there are those immoral people who will do their best to maintain this claim of historicity in order to swell the ranks (and coffers) of their churches.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 07:29 AM   #58
SLD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 4,109
Default Re: Re: Re: Why Are Numbers so Irrational?

Quote:
Originally posted by Sven
Of course .10110111011110111110111111... is an irrational number. Any number which can not be written as a fraction is irrational by definition. If you think that the above is not irrational, please provide the corresponding fraction. As an aside, gagster nowhere claimed that this number is in base 2. A real number doesn't "need" to exploit all digits from 0 to 9 to be a real number.

I see I have to retract my earlier statement that I agree with you that a circle would inevitable show up in pi, only provided one searches long enough. The number above is a good counter to the claim that every sequence of numbers will eventually show up in any irrational number.
I said he has not "defined" an irrational number. The dot dot dot means nothing. But I will concede a point here. One can indeed define an irrational number in such a way that the decimal expansion does not contain all possible combination of digits. But the point about Pi and other similar, not predefined, irrational numbers is that they have infinite decimal expansions such that they can never be defined as a fraction. As such, they should ultimately contain all completely possible sequences of digits - including what ellie found - the circle with the line in it. IIRC, she found it at some digit out to 10^26 or so. To me that seems kind of "early" in the sequence to be finding hidden messages, but hey it's still a good story, and no proof of god.

Here's a math quiz for everyone (and boy we're getting off topic) how far into the decimal expansion of Pi should one expect to find the ASCII phrase: "Jesus is God"? What's the probablity that you will find it before: "SLD is God"?

SLD
SLD is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 09:01 AM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

Since "SLD is God" is shorter than "Jesus is God" it much more likely that SLD is god than Jebus. For this purpose we can assume that the numbers of Pi are essentially a random number generator, albeit not a very good one. Since "Jesus is God" has 12 characters in it which would convert to 24 digits if we use ASCII (we could use a straight letter counting scheme which would make finding it more likely) and that means that there is a 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance of encountering "Jesus is God" in Pi. Whereas "SLD is God" is a mere 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000. This is assuming ASCII and all uppercase. I am too lazy to calculate the probabilities using a simple letter numbering scheme but it would, as stated, be much more likely.

Too much time on his hands,
Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 02-24-2004, 05:17 PM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
Default When F.N. Hutton Talks People Listen!

JW:
Here is the link to Hutton Gibson's recent interview:
http://www.speakyourpiece.net/gibson.pdf

Here's an excerpt (it was extremely difficult to pick one as all of Gibson's assertions sound the same):

Steve Feuerstein:
"What do the Jews aim to achieve?"

Gibson:
"I don’t know what their (the Jews) agenda is except that it’s all about control. They’re after one world religion and one world government. That’s why they’ve attacked the Catholic Church so strongly, to ultimately take control over it by their doctrine and make one world religion and one world government."


JW:
Without the name identification you'd think it was something Goebbels wrote. If I understand Gibson correctly he thinks "The Jews" had the power to create the Soviet Union, orchestrate both World Wars and get the US into the Wars while controlling all the money in the world before, during and after the wars but for some unexplained reason are currently powerless to prevent one person from presenting a major motion picture showing that "The Jews" killed God. Apparently "The Jews" have done such a great job secretly controlling the world that their greatest accomplishment is keeping how they do this secret from themselves but readily available to the people they control like Gibson.

After seeing the movie "Conspiracy Theory" I wondered why the hell Gibson did it. Seemed like more of a Steve Guttenberg like project. As Gibson continues to refuse to criticize his father's views, now I know why.


Joseph


"You've been de-Caiphus-nated" - Daniel Glover

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Errors...yguid=68161660

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/abdulreis/myhomepage/
JoeWallack is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.