FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2009, 02:38 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 126
Default John Loftus vs. spin splkit from New Book on Christian Origins

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
The way to deal with Holding is to hammer him every time he sticks his head out of the safe nest of his protected christian environment. You need to leave him holding the bag for all the crap apologetics he represents. When he is seen outside his comfort zone not performing well, his cadres should waver a little.

John W. participated in an internet debate not long ago, siding with Holding as to the existence of Jesus! This is part of his principle of conceding the difficult bits in order to challenge the easier ones.

Radical skepticism acknowledges that there are things that we don't have the evidence to be conclusive about. Yet it doesn't mean that we should concede issues because we cannot be conclusive enough for bunnies trained on pat answers. They have to be weaned from simplicity, rather than redirected into some other simplicity.

Holding can't hold his own (except in private).

spin
Hi Spin, I remember you, and no, I don't want to revisit the issue of whether there was a man who started the Jesus cult who was a Jewish apocalyptic doomsday prophet in line with a succession of them and in line with millenarian doomsday prophets who have failed in every generation.

But I concede nothing and don't have to because this is what I really think. It's just that it's good I think this way, because then I have more credibility in the eyes of Christians than people like you do. I think you should embrace this about me, okay? Who has the best chance of reaching them?

As far as siding with Holding goes, well, no one who reads this debate will think this, since it's crystal clear my portrait of Jesus would destroy his view of Jesus (I'm below him on the left):

http://www.opposingviews.com/questio...torical-figure

But I can agree with people I think are right and I can disagree with people I think are wrong irrespective of party line, and I do. For me there is no party line. I am first and foremost a freethinker, like my friend Bob Price, even if we may come to different conclusions. He lets me come to mine and I let him come to his.

By the way, I'm compiling a new book already approved by Prometheus Books with scholars like Drs. Jim Linville, David Eller, Hector Avalos, Bob Price, Valerie Tarico, Richard Carrier, and others. In it I have a chapter titled: "At Best Jesus Was a Failed Apocalyptic Prophet," which I think my argument can, if successful, devastate the Christian faith. Granting that the New Testament is somewhat reliable I force Christians to choose their poison: either Jesus was an apocalyptic doomsday prophet who failed because the eschaton did not take place in his generation, or the New Testament isn't even somewhat reliable. I think you'll like it when the book comes out (who knows when?).
John W. Loftus is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 05:39 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
Hi Spin, I remember you,
I'm flattered, John.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
and no, I don't want to revisit the issue of whether there was a man who started the Jesus cult who was a Jewish apocalyptic doomsday prophet in line with a succession of them and in line with millenarian doomsday prophets who have failed in every generation.
For a statement of no desire, you have certainly overqualified it, John. It was the Pharisees who said, "build a hedge around the law".

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
But I concede nothing and don't have to because this is what I really think.
I have seen the way you think, John.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
It's just that it's good I think this way, because then I have more credibility in the eyes of Christians than people like you do.
If you have credibility, it's probably the ex-junkie appeal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
I think you should embrace this about me, okay? Who has the best chance of reaching them?
The man who wants to save the world.

What's the difference between being christian and not being christian? There's only one word. It's still about being christian.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
As far as siding with Holding goes, well, no one who reads this debate will think this, since it's crystal clear my portrait of Jesus would destroy his view of Jesus (I'm below him on the left):
That's on the same side of the issue as Holding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
http://www.opposingviews.com/questio...torical-figure

But I can agree with people I think are right and I can disagree with people I think are wrong irrespective of party line, and I do.
It's not a matter of what you think, John. It's a matter of being rational. Your thought has already betrayed you once. (Remember?) You need a higher standard, based solely on evidence. But you've shown across internet that evidence is just not that important for you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
For me there is no party line. I am first and foremost a freethinker,
That's not how you appear here. My guess is that you are a reactionary.

If you've ever read the Maltese Falcon, you'd know about a fellow called Flitcraft, who had a world-shaking near-death experience. It was so devastating that he dropped everything that he was doing, left his job, wife, kids, house, everything and disappeared. His insurance took care of his family. Some years later he turned up in another town, married once again with kids and a steady job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
like my friend Bob Price,
I'm pleased you have friends, John.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
even if we may come to different conclusions. He lets me come to mine and I let him come to his.
What's interesting is how.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
By the way, I'm compiling a new book already approved by Prometheus Books with scholars like Drs. Jim Linville, David Eller, Hector Avalos, Bob Price, Valerie Tarico, Richard Carrier, and others. In it I have a chapter titled: "At Best Jesus Was a Failed Apocalyptic Prophet," which I think my argument can, if successful, devastate the Christian faith. Granting that the New Testament is somewhat reliable I force Christians to choose their poison: either Jesus was an apocalyptic doomsday prophet who failed because the eschaton did not take place in his generation, or the New Testament isn't even somewhat reliable. I think you'll like it when the book comes out (who knows when?).
Once again, I'm pleased for you, John.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 10:52 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
Hi Spin, I remember you,
I'm flattered, John.
Don't be.

You stand for the party line. Anyone who doesn't toe the party line is, well, ______ (Fill in the blank). You dismiss me because I think there was a historical person who founded the Jesus cult and that's all you care about; your little tiny pet pee(ve)nis. Good luck with that. You're not even worth my debating. As far as I can see that's the one topic here people seem to be most interested in, and I think this reveals a kind of myopic thinking, people talking to themselves about what interests them and not really trying to address the concerns of others (at least that's my perfunctorily impression).

I'm out of here too. I left crowd thinking when I left the church.

You're a "Bright," eh? Well I'm not. I guess I know my place.
John W. Loftus is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 11:03 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 126
Default

One last thing, I know this board has had its problems. People have told me about them. It reminds me of churches I was a minister of. As the minister my job was to help them grow. But there were people in them in every church who would send newcomers out the back door as quick as I could get them in the front. At some point in order to grow the members who sent others away had to go. But there was no way I could do that with those existing church members, and I dare not try. I tried to teach them, but I had to work with what I had. I have seen things here that send people away too, Spin for instance. I would give him the boot just because of his arrogance and fundamentalist type of thinking where he's right and everyone else is not just wrong, but stupid. Sound familiar? Think Holding.

Now I'm gone.
John W. Loftus is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 05:37 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I'm flattered, John.
Don't be.

You stand for the party line. Anyone who doesn't toe the party line is, well, ______ (Fill in the blank). You dismiss me because I think there was a historical person who founded the Jesus cult and that's all you care about;...
Anyone who has been on this forum long enough would know that that statement is the sort of thing that I do dismiss. It's not based on evidence. They'd know I don't dismiss John W. because of what he thinks in this instance, but because he has nothing tangible to back it up. He doesn't seem to know his scholarly responsibilities.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
... your little tiny pet pee(ve)nis. Good luck with that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
You're not even worth my debating.


Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
As far as I can see that's the one topic here people seem to be most interested in, and I think this reveals a kind of myopic thinking, people talking to themselves about what interests them and not really trying to address the concerns of others (at least that's my perfunctorily impression).
Perfunctory!

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
I'm out of here too.
:wave:

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
I left crowd thinking when I left the church.
John W. might have left the church, but he hasn't left it behind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
You're a "Bright," eh? Well I'm not. I guess I know my place.
You've always known your place, John.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 06:47 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
One last thing, I know this board has had its problems. People have told me about them. It reminds me of churches I was a minister of. As the minister my job was to help them grow. But there were people in them in every church who would send newcomers out the back door as quick as I could get them in the front. At some point in order to grow the members who sent others away had to go. But there was no way I could do that with those existing church members, and I dare not try. I tried to teach them, but I had to work with what I had. I have seen things here that send people away too, Spin for instance. I would give him the boot just because of his arrogance and fundamentalist type of thinking...
Perhaps John W. should take a poll here. Open a new thread asking people to see if they think I am arrogant and think like a fundamentalist. Give forum members the question and see how the clicks fall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
...where he's right and everyone else is not just wrong, but stupid.
John W. doesn't like it when people disagree with him. Radical skepticism can easily lead to disagreement. It's about how and why, not what. I don't mind at all -- really -- that John W. thinks that there was a historical Jesus. (And he may even be right, though he wouldn't know.) I have trouble when he cannot answer me from the available evidence why he thinks that. But John W. is still about what.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
Sound familiar? Think Holding.
Holding is also a what man.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John W. Loftus View Post
Now I'm gone.
The butterfly flits and doesn't stay anywhere very long. Nature calls.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.