Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-16-2008, 03:13 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: oz
Posts: 1,848
|
Yes.
You. Just then. Well yours is the first time I've seen it anyway. And I must admit it's an intersting idea. So if you pursue the idea via some research and find some info I 'd be interested in seeing it. |
11-16-2008, 03:24 AM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
I use a project management research technique of trying to collect anything and everything around a subject and then sifting it. So in this brainstorming mode, first thing I googled was signs of the time - a comet is a very impressive sign by definition! http://www.signstimes.com/ And lo and behold modern xians are always looking for signs. The significance of the star in the Jesus birth stories is probably underplayed by us now because we know what comets are - we have even collected some samples from one! But pre-enlightenment it probably was one of the key evidences of the truth of the son of god coming to save us story - the timeline issue was not a problem then - who has timelines in their heads - only a very few highly educated people. |
|
11-16-2008, 03:36 AM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
Above is attempting to tie Jesus to the traditional dating. I see post destruction of Jerusalem dating of the gospels as far more viable and a confusion occurring about which Halley Comet return is thought significant. I see a group of people who know of critical events - Augustus, Pilate, destruction of Jerusalem, Herod, Halley's comet, weaving together this stuff to transform a heavenly Christ into a Yahweh Joshua Annointed One Messiah. |
|
11-16-2008, 04:09 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: oz
Posts: 1,848
|
I'm currently reading Thomas Thompson's "The Messiah Myth" which has as its theme ..." the contemporary audience for whom the Old and New Testaments were written would naaturally have interpreted David and Jesus not as historical figures, but as metaphors embodying long-established messianic traditions" [from the blurb on the back of the book].
Thompson gives many numerous detailed examples of ancient texts from the immediate geographic region which illustrate motifs common to lots of these figures. Its an interesting read. He does not claim that Dave and JC are direct plagiarisms, more that the motifs themes and literary material are all readily available by cultural osmosis. They are 'in the water' sort of. So tying that idea with a comet flashing through the sky at a propitious time could lead us to suggest.... Well, all sorts of things. Possibilities. |
11-16-2008, 06:25 AM | #15 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England, Portsmouth
Posts: 5,108
|
Quote:
BRIAN: I'm not the Messiah! Fanatic: Only the true messiah would deny his divinity... BRIAN: Well what chance does that give me! Oh alright I am the Messiah! Fanatical crowd: The Messiah! The Messiah! Fanatic with the one true lords shoe: Follow the Shoe! Fanatic with the one true Gourd: No the Gourd! That at the time everyone was waiting for someone who fitted the story no matter how loosely. He's kind of like Robin Hood, some person writes a fictional account of life under the Normans and centuries later someone tries to suggest he actually existed. Did he though? I'm not so sure you can prove it? |
|
11-16-2008, 08:02 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Chances are the "Roman" historian wasn't Josephus, although he was granted Roman citizenship by emperor Vespasian. The passage where Jesus is mentioned in his Antiquties of the Jews is presently under a cloud, and most critics think it was partly, if not wholly, an interpolation inserted by a copyist or editor.
Instead, I'd recommend Tacitus. The four, yes a total of four, historical references to Jesus from just three non-Christian sources within 100 years of his reputed time are as follows: Ca. 95 CE. Josephus, Antiquities, 18.3.3. Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day. [Probable interpolation, in whole or at least in part] Ca. 115-120 CE. Tacitus Annals, lib. xv. cap. 44. or Nero, in order to stifle the rumour, [as if he himself had set Rome on fire,] ascribed it to those people who were hated for their wicked practices, and called by the vulgar “Christians”: these he punished exquisitely. The author of this name was Christ, who, in the reign of Tiberius, was brought to punishment by Pontius Pilate the procurator. But in spite of this temporary setback the deadly superstition had broken out afresh, not only in Judaea (where the mischief had started) but even in Rome. All degraded and shameful practices collect and flourish in the capital. Ca. 119-122 CE. Suetonius, Life of Claudius, 25. Because the Jews at Rome caused continuous disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus, he [Claudius, ca. 41-54 CE] expelled them from the city. [Chrestus may be a distortion of Jesus' title among Christians, or someone else entirely - it was a common slave name, or as I've suggested refers to a drug Chreston believed to cause people to become bewitched] Ca. 119-122 CE. Suetonius, Life of Nero, 16. [After the great fire of Rome, ca. 62 CE] Punishment was inflicted on the Christians, a class of men addicted to a novel and mischievous superstition. [Usually taken as a reference to "our" Christians, but I have suggested this could also be a generic title for Jewish messianists or nationalists in general] There you go. Check into Ben Smith's Test Excavation website for detailed texts on the subject. http://www.textexcavation.com/josephustestimonium.html DCH |
11-16-2008, 08:07 AM | #17 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Quote:
I've speculated here that the gospel story was set exactly 1 generation prior to the fall for symbolic propaganda reasons rather than historical reasons. I think the Jesus in the gospels might be a metaphor for the Jewish people. His death and resurrection symbolize a new Judaism (Christianity) arising from the crucifixion (humiliating defeat) of the old Judaism....all speculation mind you. |
|
11-16-2008, 08:09 AM | #18 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
|
11-16-2008, 09:05 AM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
I suppose. This is along the same lines as Suetonius' second citation. Josephus says a certain man names James (Jacob) was tried by the Jewish high priest Ananus, and that he was brother of Jesus "called Christ." "Christ" means "anointed one" and can refer to a king or high priest. The Jewish state had been run by both at some point or another in the past, and there were a number of former high priests alive at the time, some named Jesus, and the one who replaced Ananus was named Jesus. I personally think this citation is a scribal comment or marginal note that was incorporated into the text.
But, for thoroughness sake, here it is: Ca. 95 CE. Josephus, Antiquities, 20.9.1. And now Cæsar, upon hearing of the death of [the governor] Festus, sent Albinus into Judea, as procurator. But the king deprived Joseph of the high priesthood, and bestowed the succession to that dignity on the son of Ananus, who was also himself called Ananus. Now the report goes, that this elder Ananus proved a most fortunate man; for he had five sons, who had all performed the office of a high priest to God, and he had himself enjoyed that dignity a long time formerly, which had never happened to any other of our high priests. But this younger Ananus, who, as we have told you already, took the high priesthood, was a bold man in his temper, and very insolent; he was also of the sect of the Sadducees,1 who are very rigid in judging offenders above all the rest of the Jews, as we have already observed: when, therefore, Ananus was of this disposition, be thought he had now a proper opportunity [to exercise his authority.] Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the Sanhedrim of judges, and brought before then the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions.] And when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned; but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done; they also sent to the king, [Agrippa] desiring him to send to Ananus that he should act so no more, for that what he had already done was not to be justified: nay, some of them went also to meet Albinus, as he was upon his journey from Alexandria, and informed him that it was not lawful for Ananus to assemble a Sanhedrim without his consent. Whereupon Albinus complied with what they said, and wrote in anger to Ananus, and threatened that he would bring him to punishment for what he had done; on which king Agrippa took the high priesthood from him, when he had ruled but three months, and made Jesus the son of Damneus high priest. [Against the idea that this Jesus who was brother of James was the Jesus Christ, of Christian fame, was that the Christian account of James death is under quite different circumstances - more like a lynching - see the account of Hegesippus at http://www.textexcavation.com/documents/hindleyref.html] DCH Quote:
|
|
11-16-2008, 12:03 PM | #20 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
From an earlier thread about "names". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In my view, James, Peter and the other Jerusalem Nazarene pillars created the NT stories in typical Jewish midrashim fashion, with the intent of preserving and promoting a continuing Jewish perspective and pride in The Law and in their ancient and traditional culture which was in danger of becoming totally overwhelmed by, and subjugated under the steamroller of Hellenism., "Saul" or "Paul" of Tarsus and his traveling companions would have been encouraged by the Jerusalem "Pillars" to preach this particular "password" and "name" in the Synagogues throughout the Diaspora. Of course the ways, influences, and the "names" of the Hellenism did triumph (or did they?) and as yet prevail. It is my conviction that the final chapter on this subject remains yet to be written, and is being written, as mankind finally awakens to a recognition just what it was that did actually transpire in those days, and as increasing knowledge and examination finally bares X-ianity for what it really is. |
||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|