FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2005, 11:44 AM   #131
RPS
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, California USA
Posts: 1,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valz
Calvinist puts Jesus saying he came for the sinners who had no ability to receive his message, it has Jesus telling people to obey commandments they could simply not obey, it has God complaining and punishing people for not obeying his commandments even when they simply could not obey them in the first place. It also has Jesus complaining about people rejecting his message when he had not given them the ability to receive it.

Calvinist makes the whole teachings of Jesus, the commandments et all..meaningless and irrelevant.
So Calvin was a compatibilist then....
RPS is offline  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:57 PM   #132
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: De Orbe Novo
Posts: 125
Default

I’m using verbiage from another post that I think is relevant to this thread—

The Biblical view is that that “none are righteous�?—so there never is any real chance of becoming “righteous,�? or saved, without some sort of intervention from on high. More importantly, elsewhere in the Bible, god says: “I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy . . .�?—all of which seems to more or less align with a Calvinist POV.

Interestingly, the Calvinist POV and a Darwinian atheism POV result in similar consequences—consider Dawkins’s statement: "In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it . . . �?

So whether it’s Dawkins’s “blind physical forces,�? or Jehovah’s “mercy on whomever I will have mercy,�? ultimately, it boils down to the same cruel deal: we ourselves play no part in whether we get lucky/blessed, or fucked.
Storme is offline  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:20 PM   #133
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

[QUOTE=Storme]
Quote:
So whether it’s Dawkins’s “blind physical forces,�? or Jehovah’s “mercy on whomever I will have mercy,�? ultimately, it boils down to the same cruel deal: we ourselves play no part in whether we get lucky/blessed, or fucked.
Not at all. “Blind physical forces�? do not have intent. Nor do they demand worship, nor do they pretend to be beyond our capacity to even comprehend.
In any form of Christianity that includes the concept of damnation you are faced with a God who is a monster and a thug.
Calvinists differ from the normal sort of monster worshiping in that they actually revel in the eternal suffering of others (not a single one thinks that they are not among the “elect.�?)
Standard Christian monster worshipers own sense of humanity compels them to gloss over the unspeakable cruelty that Calvinists savor.
If you are not saved by your own actions but only by “grace alone�? then you are still fucked, Calvinist or not.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 12-15-2005, 06:46 PM   #134
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: De Orbe Novo
Posts: 125
Default

Quote:
BTU: Not at all. “Blind physical forces�? do not have intent. Nor do they demand worship, nor do they pretend to be beyond our capacity to even comprehend…. In any form of Christianity that includes the concept of damnation you are faced with a God who is a monster and a thug.
Yes, but so what? If you see intent in what I know is obviously random, does it really change anything? Although one would think that it might possibly give me some sort of advantage since I know something that you don’t.

OTH, I suppose that such a fantasy—finding intent in randomness—could possibly give the xian some advantage (more optimism, better health, more inclination to reproduce, etc.) over those of us who know better. But still, so what and who cares? That is, after all, how the universe that we find ourselves in, seems to work.

I find it helpful to recite the Dawkinsian creed:

Quote:
In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won't find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.
Afuckingmen.
Storme is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.