![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 536
|
![]()
Test isn't the word is it?
It's "Agree with my rant or you're a sheep, you loser" So if you think sex is better than wanking (XXII) , you're a sheep. I hope this lot stick to wanking and die out before the Singularity or second coming or whatever it is. They seem to be driven by a serious fear and loathing of other people and that is dangerous. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,029
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Inbetween the Immediate Future and recent Past
Posts: 591
|
![]()
Not this crap again...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 34
|
![]()
You can just ignore the adjectives. I scored a 3 which said I was an interesting Atheist or maybe Libertarian, which is partly true. Of course it said I "was not yet a perfect person..." etc etc etc. But I disregarded that crap.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,635
|
![]()
This doesn't look very serious to me....this is getting kicked to General Religious Discussions, only because I'm not quite sure if this warrents an ~E~ boot. I'll let the mods there decide-- *shazzam!*
~Aethari |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I stopped at number two. I can't answer this question because it has two parts that I have two different answers for.
Part one: "Most "traditional" morals and ethics should be rejected as they, instead of being useful tools for personal growth and empowerment, only make life more difficult than it already is." I pretty much agree with this, although I do realize that there are some "traditional" morals that are sound pretty good with me (Hey, you! Yeah, we'd like it if you tried to not kill anyone. Thanks!). The best answer I would be able to give from the three options is "Maybe." Part two: "From a rational individual's perspective, the "good" is that which serves his enlightened self-interest (open-ended existence under the best possible conditions), and the "bad" that which is detrimental to this goal." I don't agree with this because I think that some "good" things can serve one's self, but most of the more worthwhile "good" things would serve others along with one's self. The best answer I can give here is "No." This test is very poorly thought-out. Hey, here's a question for you: "Have you ever tried sugar or PCP?" YES or NO. ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
|
![]()
horse hockey
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 32
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|