FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2007, 05:44 PM   #111
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: A^2
Posts: 1,165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
There was on continent before Peleg was born and during his lifetime and then the one continent broke apart. Peleg lived from the year 2247-2008 BCE.
We already know this is false, and ignoring facts like these does not make your manufactured story, for which you have provided zero evidence, any more valid. All you've done by repeating the same claims over and over again in the face of facts that disprove it is to make your position more worthy of ridicule.
Mech Bliss is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 07:44 PM   #112
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East of ginger trees
Posts: 12,637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED DAVE View Post
Awaiting your reply, TonyN, with bated breath.

Perhaps you could confine yourself to:

(1) documenting a gap in Egyptian history in and around Bishop Ussher's date;

(2) documenting the death of approximately 2 million Egyptians during that gap;

(3) documenting the total collapse of Egyptian culture during that gap;

(4) documenting the slow, painful revival of Egypt from a devastation worse than anything we can imagine: total and complete destruction of population, economy and culture.

Have fun.

RED DAVE
May I add one two?

(5) documenting just HOW Noah's descendents could have recreated Egyptian culture in such perfect continuity of its past; language, writing, clothing, architecture, religion*, etc, when the entire civilisation (except the buildings) was washed away. What was their source material?

(6) * explaining why Noah's immediate descendents, after having just survived the absolutely clearest demonstration of their God's wrath and power imaginable, if not first hand then through the undoubted bone-chilling stories passed down from their elders who did, decided to turn their backs on said God, risk his wrath again, and revive the Egyptian pantheon instead.
Barefoot Bree is offline  
Old 02-23-2007, 08:12 PM   #113
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Some posts have been split off here on the general nature of historical proof.
Toto is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 03:11 PM   #114
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MiChIgAn
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mech Bliss View Post
We already know this is false, and ignoring facts like these does not make your manufactured story, for which you have provided zero evidence, any more valid. All you've done by repeating the same claims over and over again in the face of facts that disprove it is to make your position more worthy of ridicule.

Sorry friend but facts like the ones you pointed out and to which I viewed are not relevant. They are only relevant to today. The person who wrote that post was not around about 4,000 years ago so his rate of movement of the plates of TODAY do not prove the same rate of 4,000 years ago anymore than a person who drove a car a year ago averaging 90 miles per hour on the freeways but now the same person travels them at 55 miles per hour disproves that he drove them at 90 a year ago.
TonyN is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 03:16 PM   #115
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
Sorry friend but facts like the ones you pointed out and to which I viewed are not relevant. They are only relevant to today. The person who wrote that post was not around about 4,000 years ago so his rate of movement of the plates of TODAY do not prove the same rate of 4,000 years ago anymore than a person who drove a car a year ago averaging 90 miles per hour on the freeways but now the same person travels them at 55 miles per hour disproves that he drove them at 90 a year ago.
Very tired today, but I have it on my agenda to get back to you on this tomorrow.

The (or at least a key is, though (it seems to me) to think of the consequences of very fast continental movement.

I'll let you think about that, and where I'm going for now.

I'm tired, I've had a few glasses of wine, and how to set about my forthcoming post is sitting simmering on the back burner, so to speak.

Take care

David B
David B is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 03:45 PM   #116
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Piscataway, NJ, USA
Posts: 75
Default The main proof is Jack-The-Bodiless's point number 6

The Egytians and Assyrians went thru Judah many times and wrote up tremendous details of taxation, battles, etc. but never mentioned Sol or Dave or any big temples --- just described desert poverty. The Romans and Persians wrote fantastic amounts of details about rebels in Palestine, but nothing about Chris or his followers (or the Greeks about Pete, etc.).

For perspective, you might quickly look thru my little
http://oldnnew.blogspot.com , tho most of you probably know that stuff already.

Dan Shanefield
Shanefield is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 04:06 PM   #117
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyN View Post
Sorry friend but facts like the ones you pointed out and to which I viewed are not relevant. They are only relevant to today. The person who wrote that post was not around about 4,000 years ago so his rate of movement of the plates of TODAY do not prove the same rate of 4,000 years ago anymore than a person who drove a car a year ago averaging 90 miles per hour on the freeways but now the same person travels them at 55 miles per hour disproves that he drove them at 90 a year ago.
Any evidence of these plates moving much faster?
Roller is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 04:13 PM   #118
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roller View Post
Any evidence of these plates moving much faster?
Of course there is!

If they hadn't, the biblical accounts couldn't even have any special pleading to defend them!

Believe in the bible, and that is pretty much how it had to have happened.

The only counter thesis I can come up with to make the bible and the geological/evolutionary/etc record to come up with, is that god deliberately set things up so that people with critical thinking skills would be led astray by the appearance of age that he deliberately created, so that he could have some sort of rationale for damning us.

And that would make god a real SOB, would it not?

But I'm open to other suggestions.

David B (does not think that the observations we make about the world are consistent with thousands of miles of continental drift happening in a couple of hundred years)
David B is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 04:37 PM   #119
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David B View Post
David B (does not think that the observations we make about the world are consistent with thousands of miles of continental drift happening in a couple of hundred years)
They are not.

I will, however, wait for TonyN's reply to substantiate his claim with some data. I'd like to see what would happen to plates moving at much greater speeds (especially accelerating and deaccelerating)
Roller is offline  
Old 02-24-2007, 08:48 PM   #120
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Paradise! aka Panama City Beach, Fla. USofA
Posts: 1,923
Wink No. ah...

Noah is 500 years old at the end of Genesis 5, verse 32. This is when God supposedly tells him of the flood that is coming a hundred years down the road.

hmmmm, okay I'll buy that, sounds somewhat logical.

Noah has three sons, [providing he has already begot them when he is 500 yo.] who help him build the ark plus keep all the animals that have gathered.
Unless the animals packed their own lunch some how they had to be fed.

How many animals were there again? My rough guess would be 5 million...

Noah and his sons would also have to build some place to keep all these animals, like a zoo or something, to keep them alive, according to Genesis 6:20, until the big day that everyone and everything boards the ark according to Genesis 7:13-16.

Now the people all getting on the ark, on that very day, I can buy, but all those animals? [you do the math of how many per second it would take to get the animals on board the ark]
While the flood has already started? With everyone else in panic trying to get on board?


No. ah..


Genesis should start with "Once upon a time..." so that the Bible fits into it's proper literary genre...
DISSIDENT AGGRESSOR is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.