FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2006, 09:16 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Perhaps we should come at this from a different angle.

Is there any evidence that the entire Egyptian culture, from early beginnings to it's end, might have occurred completely AFTER a date of around 2348 BC or 2304 BC?

Or is there any evidence that Egyptian culture sprang up "out of whole cloth" sometime around the incident at the Tower of Babel?

Hmmm?
Kosh is offline  
Old 08-07-2006, 09:20 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: A Windswept Hill on the Prairie Peninsula
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarpedon
A fragment of wood found in a pile of construction debris can be dated with Carbon 14, and the age of the pile can be established.
You still won't know the age of the pile. You will only know for sure when the tree the wood came from died.

Quote:
Whats more: we can study the stones of the pyramid and determine exactly which quarry they came from (being sedimentary, the stones have a unique pattern caused by sediment that can be matched to other stones). Thus, the waste piles at the quarry sites can be positively associated with the pyramid. (many of them were abandoned afterwards, and you can see the pits where the stones were quarried out of) And the age is then determined.
What if the debris at the quarry was the result of quarrying for another building entirely...hundreds of years later, but from the same stone?
flintknapper is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 12:50 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flintknapper
You still won't know the age of the pile. You will only know for sure when the tree the wood came from died.
Normally, people cut down trees for building very close to the time they actually build.
Sven is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 01:21 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh
Is there an egyptian heiroglyph for "World Wide Flood"?
Is there a hieroglyph for "facilitator"?

Does the hieroglyph for "salesman" involve a crocodile...

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 07:50 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
Default

Quote:
A fragment of wood found in a pile of construction debris can be dated with Carbon 14, and the age of the pile can be established.
Given egyptian construction techniques, it is unlikely that the wooden tools had a long life-span. For example, to quarry stone, they would bore a hole using a copper chisel or obsidion bit, jam a wooden wedge in there, and then dump water over it, causing the wood to expand and split the rock. Wedges thus used would not have a long life span. Also, we have wood slivers from these wedges that were found in situ in the drilled holes

Quote:
What if the debris at the quarry was the result of quarrying for another building entirely...hundreds of years later, but from the same stone?
You weren't listening. I said that some of the quarries were used only for the pyramid, and were abandoned. We know because we can match the stone, the rectangular pits are still there. There is also no sign of later waste, such as more advanced tools, etc. People in later times were lazier. Rather than quarrying their own stone, they stole it from the outside of the pyramid.

Keep in mind I'm summarizing. Archaeologists have lots of different ways of determining ages, and they've been working on this stuff for decades. Unless someone presents contradictory evidence, I'm quite content to accept the evidence that I've seen, and the explainations offered.
Sarpedon is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 08:15 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarpedon
People in later times were lazier. Rather than quarrying their own stone, they stole it from the outside of the pyramid.
I think your terminology is a little out of date. These days, that practice is referred to as "eco-recycling".
Kosh is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 05:06 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse

His name? Eusebius of Caesarea.

The same man was charged with perverting the Egyptian chronologies.
Off-hand, I dont recall who levels these charges at Eusebius, but I do
recall reading this. Perhaps someone knows who makes this claim of
the Eusebian chronology of the Egyptian antiquity.



Pete Brown
mountainman is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 07:35 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 440
Default

For Egyptian chronology, since astronomical records are so sparse, it seems, it would be difficult if not impossible to construct an absolute chronology that we can be confident of down to the year. We can, however, use calibrated carbon-14 dating to narrow down the date of artifacts to a margin of roughly 30 years. The pyramids have inscriptions telling us which pharaoh built them, and Assyrian and Babylonian synchronisms are a huge help, since astronomical records were meticulously kept in those civilizations; Babylonian chronology back to 747 BC (year 1 of Nabonassar) is fixed within a margin of less than a year, as is Assyrian chronology back to 911 BC (year 1 of Adad-nirari II); absolute dates are attained for Egypt basically via Assyrian and Babylonian synchronisms- Egyptian chronology itself is fixed, independent of any synchronisms, back to 690 BC (year 1 of Taharqa); from before this period exact dates are difficult; we have a few astronomic records, one of a partial eclipse dating to year 15 of Takelot II, the only real candidate for which is 822 BC; before that we have a record of lunar observations dating to year 52 of Rameses II, which, although these particular lunar phenomena take place every 25 years, in view of the cumulative regnal years of the pharaohs after him, was probably 1228 BC. A few other observations put the most likely date of the accession of Ahmose I, first pharaoh of the New Kingdom, at 1550 BC; before this we have only rough dates- any date you see for the Old or Middle Kingdom, you should allow for a margin of around 20 years. Still, in view of how long ago we're talking about, this is a very small margin.
rob117 is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 12:33 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob117
For Egyptian chronology, since astronomical records are so sparse, it seems, it would be difficult if not impossible to construct an absolute chronology that we can be confident of down to the year. We can, however, use calibrated carbon-14 dating to narrow down the date of artifacts to a margin of roughly 30 years. The pyramids have inscriptions telling us which pharaoh built them, and Assyrian and Babylonian synchronisms are a huge help, since astronomical records were meticulously kept in those civilizations; Babylonian chronology back to 747 BC (year 1 of Nabonassar) is fixed within a margin of less than a year, as is Assyrian chronology back to 911 BC (year 1 of Adad-nirari II); absolute dates are attained for Egypt basically via Assyrian and Babylonian synchronisms- Egyptian chronology itself is fixed, independent of any synchronisms, back to 690 BC (year 1 of Taharqa); from before this period exact dates are difficult; we have a few astronomic records, one of a partial eclipse dating to year 15 of Takelot II, the only real candidate for which is 822 BC; before that we have a record of lunar observations dating to year 52 of Rameses II, which, although these particular lunar phenomena take place every 25 years, in view of the cumulative regnal years of the pharaohs after him, was probably 1228 BC. A few other observations put the most likely date of the accession of Ahmose I, first pharaoh of the New Kingdom, at 1550 BC; before this we have only rough dates- any date you see for the Old or Middle Kingdom, you should allow for a margin of around 20 years. Still, in view of how long ago we're talking about, this is a very small margin.
May I ask where you got this information from?
Sven is offline  
Old 08-09-2006, 06:57 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven
May I ask where you got this information from?
Various sources- The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (or via: amazon.co.uk), A History of the Ancient Near East: c. 3000-323 BC (or via: amazon.co.uk), various wikipedia articles, etc.
rob117 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.