FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-12-2008, 02:22 PM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone View Post
Maybe you are entirely right,that it is unfair of me to come here and use this site as a means of personal growth,if I have nothing of value to share in return.
This forum is for discussion of topics related to Biblical Criticism and History. If you have "nothing of value to share" in such discussions, then you are correct in thinking you are in the wrong place.

Perhaps The Lounge is where you want to work on your "personal growth"?
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 02:26 PM   #92
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
Somehow a lot seems to be getting lost in translation here. You are nothing if not adamant about conversion.
Certainly no more than you are since you said that you have no choice except to remain a Christian. How much more adamant could anyone be than that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
Maybe it's me, John. Perhaps I took a wrong turn in coming here to start with, and your just trying to help me figure this out now rather than later.

Maybe you are entirely right, that it is unfair of me to come here and use this site as a means of personal growth, if I have nothing of value to share in return.

Is this the gist of it?
I do not have any objections to you wanting to strengthen your faith, but for purposes of this thread, how do you hope to strenghten your faith by discussing Adam and Eve? Since the Bible is the claimant, it is not up to skeptics to prove to your satisfaction that any premise in the story of Adam and Eve is faulty.

Why should skeptics help you strengthen your faith, especially since you have said that you do not have any choice except to remain a Christian? The Theology Web is primarily Christian. If a skeptic went there with the sole stated intention of strengthening his skepticism, and said that he had no choice except to remain a skeptic, what would you recommend that Christians at the Theology Web do? Why would they want to help an adamant skeptic strengthen his skepticism?

Are you not aware that you are strengthening the beliefs of every skeptic who has read your posts, and that none of the undecided crowd will accept your "faith only" argument? If you are actually saved, and never intend to give up Christianity under any circumstances, you will not be any more saved when you vacate this thread than you are now. However, if the God of the Bible exists, your presence at this forum might cause some nominal Christians to give up Christianity, or cause some undecided people who do not make posts to come to the conclusion that a "faith only" argument discredits Christianity, which in my opinion it does.

Am I correct that it is your intention to try to make skeptics the claimants by asking them to provide reasonable evidence of a faulty premise regarding the story of Adam and Eve?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 02:49 PM   #93
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southeast
Posts: 60
Default

I've given a moments thought of strengthening or weakening anyones faith or beliefs.I also think it is very presumptuous to conclude that I have had that effect on everyone.You never know what shapes a persons beliefs,or what registers with a person.

I mean I get your point,but If the bible is true,which I contend it is.People are saved through the foolishness of preaching.So if I have become a fool in order that someone might hear the word and by hearing be saved,than a fool I shall be.
sonofone is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 02:51 PM   #94
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southeast
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone View Post
Maybe you are entirely right,that it is unfair of me to come here and use this site as a means of personal growth,if I have nothing of value to share in return.
This forum is for discussion of topics related to Biblical Criticism and History. If you have "nothing of value to share" in such discussions, then you are correct in thinking you are in the wrong place.

Perhaps The Lounge is where you want to work on your "personal growth"?
Take a look at how many people have both viewed and made post on this topic since it was started.It has obviously sparked interest,if it had or has no value why not let it fizzle out like a lot of post with no interest or value do?
sonofone is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 03:02 PM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone View Post
Take a look at how many people have both viewed and made post on this topic since it was started.It has obviously sparked interest,if it had or has no value why not let it fizzle out like a lot of post with no interest or value do?
None of which is relevant to the specific purpose of this forum and that of the others available to you. If this thread becomes primarily about a topic inappropriate for this forum, it will be moved or locked.

Just read the description of what is appropriate to each forum and attempt to adhere to it. Very simple.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:06 PM   #96
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: southeast
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone View Post
Take a look at how many people have both viewed and made post on this topic since it was started.It has obviously sparked interest,if it had or has no value why not let it fizzle out like a lot of post with no interest or value do?
None of which is relevant to the specific purpose of this forum and that of the others available to you. If this thread becomes primarily about a topic inappropriate for this forum, it will be moved or locked.

Just read the description of what is appropriate to each forum and attempt to adhere to it. Very simple.
Well thanks for your input just the same.I'm willing to let this post go,as I intended to as of post #71 pg 3 and consider it a lesson learned.Thanks for the conversation,it was certainly worth the ride.:wave:
sonofone is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:29 PM   #97
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
5 - Matthew and Luke borrowed a good deal from John.
John or Mark?
jeremyp is offline  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:29 PM   #98
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
Well thanks for your [Amaleq 13] input just the same. I'm willing to let this post go [Johnny Skeptic: You meant this thread, not this post.], as I intended to as of post #71 pg 3 and consider it a lesson learned. Thanks for the conversation, it was certainly worth the ride.
Why was it worth ride? I hope that you read this post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
Maybe it's me, John. Perhaps I took a wrong turn in coming here to start with, and your just trying to help me figure this out now rather than later.

Maybe you are entirely right, that it is unfair of me to come here and use this site as a means of personal growth, if I have nothing of value to share in return.

Is this the gist of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnySkeptic
I do not have any objections to you wanting to strengthen your faith, but for purposes of this thread, how do you hope to strenghten your faith by discussing Adam and Eve? Since the Bible is the claimant, it is not up to skeptics to prove to your satisfaction that any premise in the story of Adam and Eve is faulty.

Why should skeptics help you strengthen your faith, especially since you have said that you do not have any choice except to remain a Christian? The Theology Web is primarily Christian. If a skeptic went there with the sole stated intention of strengthening his skepticism, and said that he had no choice except to remain a skeptic, what would you recommend that Christians at the Theology Web do? Why would they want to help an adamant skeptic strengthen his skepticism?

Are you not aware that you are strengthening the beliefs of every skeptic who has read your posts, and that none of the undecided crowd will accept your "faith only" argument? If you are actually saved, and never intend to give up Christianity under any circumstances, you will not be any more saved when you vacate this thread than you are now. However, if the God of the Bible exists, your presence at this forum might cause some nominal Christians to give up Christianity, or cause some undecided people who do not make posts to come to the conclusion that a "faith only" argument discredits Christianity, which in my opinion it does.

Am I correct that it is your intention to try to make skeptics the claimants by asking them to provide reasonable evidence of a faulty premise regarding the story of Adam and Eve?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
I've given a moment's thought of strengthening or weakening anyones faith or beliefs. I also think it is very presumptuous to conclude that I have had that effect on everyone. You never know what shapes a persons beliefs, or what registers with a person.
But I did not say "everyone." I just wanted you to consider the possible negative effects that might happen when nominal Christians and undecided people read your posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
I mean I get your point, but if the Bible is true, which I contend it is, people are saved through the foolishness of preaching. So if I have become a fool in order that someone might hear the word and by hearing be saved, then a fool I shall be.
And if the Bible is false, which I contend it is, no one will be saved by reading your posts, so what do you recommend now for purposes of this thread? Please clearly state your intentions. Is it your sole intention to strenghten your faith? If so, why should skeptics help you strengthen your faith? The Theology Web is primarily Christian. If a skeptic went there with the sole stated intention of strengthening his skepticism, and said that he had no choice except to remain a skeptic, what would you recommend that Christians at the Theology Web do? Why would Christians at the Theology Web want to help an adamant skeptic strengthen his skepticism?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
I was actually hoping to get a little more than agreement from skeptics that God treated Adam unfairly. I was hoping to see if the story operates from a faulty premise.
I believe that it would be more accurate to say that you are attempting to get skeptics to become the claimants by asking them to reasonably prove that there is a faulty premise, when in fact the Bible is the claimant, and it implies that God treated Adam and Eve fairly. Is my assessment correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofone
As you might imagine Christians don't take to kindly to what appears to be an attack of the scriptures or God.
Are you surprised when skeptics don't take kindly to conservative Christian claiming that God will send skeptics to hell for eternity without parole? Are you surprised when skeptics complain about God injuring and killing people and innocent animals with hurricanes? Would you be surprised if under certain different circumstances, you would not have been a Christian?

Do you really believe that it is not reasonable for skeptics to judge what God DOES, not who he IS? Under our legal system, no one is above the law. If the President of the United States commits murder he will be prosecuted just like anyone else would be prosecuted.

As Amaleq 13 said, this is the Biblical Criticism and History Forum. Obviously, the story of Adam and Eve does not pertain to Biblical Criticism and History.
Such being the case, I recommend that you start a new thread at the General Religious Discussions Forum.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:09 AM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joan of Bark View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post

What you need to do is to provide credible historical evidence that the story of Adam and Eve is true. Otherwise, what good is it to discuss the story?

After you have finished with this thread, then you will still have the task of reasonably proving that God is a moral being, assuming that a God exists. That issue would be best discussed at the GRD Forum or at the MF&P Forum.
We can discuss the allegorical meaning of the story, as a way of understanding the beliefs of those who wrote it.[/QUOTE] We know what these primitive people believed. They believed in a flat earth, with god's abode directly above, just out of sight. They believed in gods under every stone. They had no understanding of the awesome power of nature.
Actually, they believed god was right there with them, for as Genesis states, after Adam and Eve sinned, god was walking in the cool of the day in the garden, and couldn't find Adam. ''Adam where are you'' he asked. We are talking here about an ''all seeing, all knowing God don't forget. Yet he had no idea where Adam was, or that they ''had of the fruit of the tree of knowledge''
If that is not a primitive, savages idea of the nature of things, what is?
angelo is offline  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:26 AM   #100
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Stone View Post
First, the debate about Adam and Eve only really matters if they ever existed, which there is absolutely no evidence to support.

Second, the inerrant nature of scripture only really matters if god ever existed as something other than a human construct, which there is absolutely no evidence to support.

Third and finally, the inerrancy of scripture (be it christian or otherwise) is intimately tied to any claims to validity or literal interpretation used by any religious. If the scripture itself cannot be proven to be the true and literal word of god, or at least those parts not literal in intent but allegorical/metaphorical/etc. cannot be identified as such, then any interpretations of said scripture cannot be claimed as valid.

Done and done. Anyone adhering to such beliefs indulges in ongoing self-delusion and intellectual hypocrisy. Engaging such beliefs is analogous to taking an aspirin to cure cancer, despite all the proof that such a remedy will not be forthcoming.
Way off topic I know. I once knew this very naive lady who used take an Aspirin after sex to prevent pregancy. She swore it worked after years of use.
The beliefs of some people are astonishing.
angelo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.