FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2008, 07:55 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
... if you establish the new testament writings were consistent "enough" prior to this period, then what the Arians believed really doesn't matter, theologically. ...
~Steve
It is not my concern.
What the Protestants believe does'nt matter.
What the Catholics believe does'nt matter.
What the Orthodoxes believe does'nt matter. Etc... Theologically, I mean.
All of them follow what the apostles taught. Paul and the "pillars", of course.
And the Muslims (every sect) also have the true religion.
I may have misunderstood the subject of the thread, but I thought we were dsicussing the means, motives, and opportunity that early church fathers might have had in altering texts to suit what they believe. I am not concerned about what they beleived either. I am concerned about establishing that what they beleived was consistent with what the Apostles beleived. writings that pre-date each of these conflicts is the only way to get around the viewpoint of the winner of the conflict.

I do not need to trust Athanasius copy of the bible, because I can get around him to an earlier copy. Wouldn't you agree?

~Steve
sschlichter is offline  
Old 05-17-2008, 08:18 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Out of curiosity? Do you know if Wulfila's translation is consistent with others? I know he skipped violent OT books (Kings maybe) intentionally but am curious otherwise?

~Steve
According to Metzger "The Early Versions of the New Testament (or via: amazon.co.uk)" Ulfilas was a very literal translator. The only clear example of bias may be Philippians 2:6 where "equal with God" is translated "similar to God."

Andrew Criddle
thanks,

I guess that would be expected. If he was going to change something, that would be a place to start.

~Steve
sschlichter is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.