FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 05:15 AM   #591
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rizdek View Post

These two accounts are contradictory. Either they said something to some man or they did not say something to any man. The word "any" is a categorical term to mean...any as in not any. As in does any man get into heaven without believing in JC? Christians response...no, not any man. Not just some, not a few, not some particular man or men, but "any" which directly implies any of all the men. Even at that, Matt says they ran with fear and joy to bring word to the disciples. Running to bring word to disciples is different than not saying any thing to any man.
Well said! >< I discussed this earlier (my last post about it was #248) with dlb, but he abandoned the discussion without explanation. Let's see if you have better luck!
thentian is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:20 AM   #592
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rizdek View Post

These two accounts are contradictory. Either they said something to some man or they did not say something to any man. The word "any" is a categorical term to mean...any as in not any. As in does any man get into heaven without believing in JC? Christians response...no, not any man. Not just some, not a few, not some particular man or men, but "any" which directly implies any of all the men. Even at that, Matt says they ran with fear and joy to bring word to the disciples. Running to bring word to disciples is different than not saying any thing to any man.
It says the women told no one because they were afraid. When they got over their initial fear, then they were no longer in this condition. It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down. they did not tell while they were afraid.

Matthew skipped right over this pause. Luke, however, mentions the women coming out of it and then going to tell the disciples. Luk 24:8 Then the women remembered his words,. Lukes statement is confusing without knowing that the women first were not going to tell anyone. then, they remembered his words and ran to tell the disciples.

~Steve
sschlichter is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 05:39 AM   #593
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizdek View Post

These two accounts are contradictory. Either they said something to some man or they did not say something to any man. The word "any" is a categorical term to mean...any as in not any. As in does any man get into heaven without believing in JC? Christians response...no, not any man. Not just some, not a few, not some particular man or men, but "any" which directly implies any of all the men. Even at that, Matt says they ran with fear and joy to bring word to the disciples. Running to bring word to disciples is different than not saying any thing to any man.
It says the women told no one because they were afraid. When they got over their initial fear, then they were no longer in this condition. It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down. they did not tell while they were afraid.

Matthew skipped right over this pause. Luke, however, mentions the women coming out of it and then going to tell the disciples. Luk 24:8 Then the women remembered his words,. Lukes statement is confusing without knowing that the women first were not going to tell anyone. then, they remembered his words and ran to tell the disciples.

~Steve
It would of course be wanton to maintain that they never told anyone ever. However, can you in all honesty reconcile it with (Matthew 28:8) "And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word. "
thentian is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 06:44 AM   #594
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thentian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post

It says the women told no one because they were afraid. When they got over their initial fear, then they were no longer in this condition. It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down. they did not tell while they were afraid.

Matthew skipped right over this pause. Luke, however, mentions the women coming out of it and then going to tell the disciples. Luk 24:8 Then the women remembered his words,. Lukes statement is confusing without knowing that the women first were not going to tell anyone. then, they remembered his words and ran to tell the disciples.

~Steve
It would of course be wanton to maintain that they never told anyone ever. However, can you in all honesty reconcile it with (Matthew 28:8) "And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word. "
The awkward-ness felt on my part is how Mark decided to end the story. His ending is supposed to dramatically leave it at that point with 'the rest is history' type ending. (this being the actual ending of Mark's gospel). Perhaps he has still not adapted to the reforms that came with christianity at the point of his writng and thought the womens testimony un-worthy of mention. (pure speculation).

It is later (according to most) that Matthew, Luke, John included more post-resurrection details. Matthew's detail say they left the sepulchre quickly, and ran to tell the disciples. It does not say they quickly ran to tell the disciples (ignoring any pause - but not contradicting it). Technically, the 'quickly' goes with leaving the sepulchre, not the running and telling. Matthew includes the fact that they were afraid but makes no mention of the results of the fear (a pause before running and telling). 'and ran to tell the disciples' is a separate thought.

Luke, perhaps having Mark's account in mind, mentions that the women remembered what the angel said and then ran to tell them. It is only the harmonization that makes Lukes statement logical because his narrative says nothing of forgetting, so why does he mention remembering? I think he does so to accomodate Mark's detail and ending.

I would agree that, in English anyway, Matt 28:8 and Mark 16:8 is awkward.

~Steve
sschlichter is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 06:47 AM   #595
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thentian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rizdek View Post

These two accounts are contradictory. Either they said something to some man or they did not say something to any man. The word "any" is a categorical term to mean...any as in not any. As in does any man get into heaven without believing in JC? Christians response...no, not any man. Not just some, not a few, not some particular man or men, but "any" which directly implies any of all the men. Even at that, Matt says they ran with fear and joy to bring word to the disciples. Running to bring word to disciples is different than not saying any thing to any man.
Well said! >< I discussed this earlier (my last post about it was #248) with dlb, but he abandoned the discussion without explanation. Let's see if you have better luck!
I think this is the best objection raised so far and is worthy of discussion. I did not see it earlier.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 07:30 AM   #596
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Texas, U.S.
Posts: 5,844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post

It says the women told no one because they were afraid. When they got over their initial fear, then they were no longer in this condition. It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down. they did not tell while they were afraid.
Are you equating the terms "because" with "for as long as"? That doesn't make sense.
James Brown is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 07:49 AM   #597
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: charleston sc
Posts: 1,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13 View Post
Yes, your narrative implausibly has Mary upset and concerned about where Jesus' living body has been "laid".
you really are good at being illogical, not only have you ignored my above post you have created a strawman, even if mary was talking about the dead body it is still plausible.



Quote:
Your own source says otherwise.
funny how the realm of informal logic states that arguments from authority are fallacious.


Quote:
Except she was, just moments before, joyful upon hearing that Jesus was alive. Implausible. If you think that is a plausible plot development, you would starve to death as an author.
another strawman and you have ignored my above post. She didn't believe the angels story so whether or not she heard Jesus was alive makes no difference if the story is unbelievable. Another failure

Quote:

Matthew's joy says otherwise whether you are willing to accept it or not.
The joy came from hope of not seeing Jesus's body. Another strawman.


Quote:
I mean there is no hope in John 20:2 or 20:13. There is really only hope in Matthew's joy after she hears that Jesus is alive.
There is plenty of hope there. Just because she is crying does not mean she doesn't have hope. Your personal interpretations of the scripture are not a valid criticism here. Once again you have failed.

leaving you once again back at square 1
dr lazer blast is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 08:30 AM   #598
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
OK. Let's try this.
Witness A: "It was raining."
Witness B: " It was not raining."
Do you think it would be reasonable for me to believe, without knowing or understanding anything about Witness A or Witness B, that they were contradicting each other?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
If your goal is to find contradictions as their stories increase in details, then yes - assume they are twins, talking at the exact same time, about the exact same time, exact same place, same purpose.
In referring to them as witnesses, it is implied that they are testifying to the same event. By definition, one event occurs at one time and in one place. Beyond that, I assume nothing.

I ask again: Am I being unreasonable if I think they contradict each other?
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 08:33 AM   #599
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesABrown View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post

It says the women told no one because they were afraid. When they got over their initial fear, then they were no longer in this condition. It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down. they did not tell while they were afraid.
Are you equating the terms "because" with "for as long as"? That doesn't make sense.
well, we know that it does not mean that they never told anyone for the rest of their lives. So, the silence is associated with some condition. It says right in the text that the silence is "because" of their fear. you cannot argue that their is no relationship between the silence and the fear.

Luke makes it clear that they later remembered and this is when they got over their fear. The did not tell anyone because of the fear that is now overcome. so they ran and told the disciples.

in short, yes.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 07-10-2008, 08:36 AM   #600
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
It is impossible to interpret it as never telling anyone ever because Mark would not have been able to write it down.
Unless he was writing fiction. In that case, no problem.
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.