Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Peter Kirby · 02-16-2005, 09:17 AM

Actually, yes, I want to minimize my role in this project. I already have some admin's that I feel are trustworthy, and I plan to have seven to ten. Once some good procedures and guidelines and overall heirarchy are established, the site could run itself.

By the way, Vorkosigan, I would love to see your contributions...

best,
Peter Kirby

Calzaer · 02-16-2005, 10:26 AM

Looks like a fun idea, and I like the homepage.

I signed up, and hopefully I'll get time to contribute here in the next week or so... I have lots of books on eastern philosophy (Taoism, Legalism, etc) and paganism that I could synthesize to help fill some tiny gaps.

Peter Kirby · 02-16-2005, 10:36 AM

Calzaer: sounds great! That is an area in which we will need filling in.

best,
Peter Kirby

Celsus · 02-16-2005, 10:42 AM

Now that most of the BC&H lot have seen it, it might be a good idea to run it round the other subfora, particularly EoG, GRD and NARP.

Joel

Toto · 02-16-2005, 11:03 AM

I will copy the thread to GRD and NARP. I'm not sure if EoG is necessary.

GRD and NARP: please consult the original thread for updates.

Peter Kirby · 02-16-2005, 11:13 AM

Oops... I already did the post to EoG. It is relevant, though, with philosophy of religion, proofs about God, etc.

best,
Peter Kirby

Toto · 02-16-2005, 11:38 AM

We don't usually allow multiple threads in different forums (it's considered spamming), but since it's Peter Kirby and it's a good non-profit cause, we'll make an exception just this once.

But don't anyone else try it.

Chris Weimer · 02-16-2005, 03:55 PM

Darn, I'll have to save all my atheist lesbian action sites for another place then, huh?

Once again, I urge people to come and try your hand at writing introductory articles for the new wiki.

Kosh · 02-16-2005, 04:06 PM

Peter,

what is your strategy for dealing with the following scenario:

Jesus Myther 1 posts information about how Jesus is a myth.

ChristianFundy disagrees with the information and edits it to support
an HJ.

???????

Chris Weimer · 02-16-2005, 04:16 PM

Kosh,

First of all, we moderators can view at any given point both sets of information and revert that which was corrupted. However, in that scenario, probably both evidence, as long as they're proper, will be fused together. If it becomes a problem, then we are able to lock the pages and then it would require a request for a necessary change.

Chris

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

02-16-2005, 09:17 AM	#11
Peter Kirby Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor Posts: 4,035	Actually, yes, I want to minimize my role in this project. I already have some admin's that I feel are trustworthy, and I plan to have seven to ten. Once some good procedures and guidelines and overall heirarchy are established, the site could run itself. By the way, Vorkosigan, I would love to see your contributions... best, Peter Kirby

02-16-2005, 10:26 AM	#12
Calzaer Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Ohio Posts: 2,762	Looks like a fun idea, and I like the homepage. I signed up, and hopefully I'll get time to contribute here in the next week or so... I have lots of books on eastern philosophy (Taoism, Legalism, etc) and paganism that I could synthesize to help fill some tiny gaps.

02-16-2005, 10:36 AM	#13
Peter Kirby Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor Posts: 4,035	Calzaer: sounds great! That is an area in which we will need filling in. best, Peter Kirby

02-16-2005, 10:42 AM	#14
Celsus Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Singapore Posts: 2,875	Now that most of the BC&H lot have seen it, it might be a good idea to run it round the other subfora, particularly EoG, GRD and NARP. Joel

02-16-2005, 11:03 AM	#15
Toto Contributor Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Los Angeles area Posts: 40,549	I will copy the thread to GRD and NARP. I'm not sure if EoG is necessary. GRD and NARP: please consult the original thread for updates.

02-16-2005, 11:13 AM	#16
Peter Kirby Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor Posts: 4,035	Oops... I already did the post to EoG. It is relevant, though, with philosophy of religion, proofs about God, etc. best, Peter Kirby

02-16-2005, 11:38 AM	#17
Toto Contributor Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Los Angeles area Posts: 40,549	We don't usually allow multiple threads in different forums (it's considered spamming), but since it's Peter Kirby and it's a good non-profit cause, we'll make an exception just this once. But don't anyone else try it.

02-16-2005, 03:55 PM	#18
Chris Weimer Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: none Posts: 9,879	Darn, I'll have to save all my atheist lesbian action sites for another place then, huh? Once again, I urge people to come and try your hand at writing introductory articles for the new wiki.

02-16-2005, 04:06 PM	#19
Kosh Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Orions Belt Posts: 3,911	Peter, what is your strategy for dealing with the following scenario: Jesus Myther 1 posts information about how Jesus is a myth. ChristianFundy disagrees with the information and edits it to support an HJ. ???????

02-16-2005, 04:16 PM	#20
Chris Weimer Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: none Posts: 9,879	Kosh, First of all, we moderators can view at any given point both sets of information and revert that which was corrupted. However, in that scenario, probably both evidence, as long as they're proper, will be fused together. If it becomes a problem, then we are able to lock the pages and then it would require a request for a necessary change. Chris

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.