FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2008, 02:43 PM   #81
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
As far as archeology is concerned what part of the bible has been discredited? I'm willing to be educated.
Pretty much every historical claim made in the Pentateuch, for a start. Hitting some highlights, there was no Garden, no flood, no Patriarchs, no enslavement in Egypt, no Moses, no Exodus, no Israelite conquest of Canaan and no United Kingdom of David and Solomon. Consider yourself educated.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:44 PM   #82
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
As far as archeology is concerned what part of the bible has been discredited?
1. Moderators should start a new thread, to keep you from deliberately derailing this one.

2. Huge portions of the bible have been discredited by archaeology. In fact, archaeology is probably one of the strongest enemies of the fundamentalist point of view.

Quote:
I'm willing to be educated.
If that were the case, you'd read the posts that people have been making, instead of skipping them and asking the same questions over and over.

You are here to preach - nothing else.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:45 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
I've studied graduate level research,
1. In what subject area?

2. What exactly does "studied graduate level research" mean? Were you a grad student yourself? Or did you just read the work of graduate level material, and somehow this constitutes "studied research" in your mind?

Quote:
I'm sure you have statistical data and sources to back up your claims.
Glad you brought that up. When do you plan to produce any proof for your claims?

Did you think that we had forgotten that you skipped that very big step?
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:49 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South America
Posts: 1,856
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
I'm looking forward for you "archaelogical proof" of this or at least a link that verifies you claims.
There were some good threads about this in the past if you search iidb.
juergen is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:54 PM   #85
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juergen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
I'm looking forward for you "archaelogical proof" of this or at least a link that verifies you claims.
There were some good threads about this in the past if you search iidb.
Two problems:

1. that requires work
2. it interferes with preaching

I wouldn't get your hopes up.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:09 PM   #86
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South America
Posts: 1,856
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by juergen View Post

There were some good threads about this in the past if you search iidb.
Two problems:

1. that requires work
2. it interferes with preaching

I wouldn't get your hopes up.
Yeah.

I guess it could be seen as a challenge.

If someone's interested in finding out what's out there, it would be the easiest way to get started.

OTOH, if someone's just interested in trying to find weaknesses in an opponent's POV without actually wanting to learn anything about the subject in question, then that would become quickly apparent.

My first reaction tells me it's the latter, but since he said that he's willing to be educated...
juergen is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:10 PM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
From a geological standpoint I think it's ignorant to think that all "fundies' think the world is only six thousand years old.
I have to agree that there is nothing "geological" about this "standpoint" but I would also point out that it has no connection to the post to which it is supposedly a response (ie non sequitur)

Quote:
As far as archeology is concerned what part of the bible has been discredited? I'm willing to be educated.
I encourage you to use the search function. There have been several threads along those lines in the past.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:25 PM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
As far as archeology is concerned what part of the bible has been discredited? I'm willing to be educated.
Pretty much every historical claim made in the Pentateuch, for a start. Hitting some highlights, there was no Garden, no flood, no Patriarchs, no enslavement in Egypt, no Moses, no Exodus, no Israelite conquest of Canaan and no United Kingdom of David and Solomon. Consider yourself educated.
I guess the fact that the State of Israel exists this very moment is only the result of political actions and not due to the Abrahamic promise.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:27 PM   #89
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Pretty much every historical claim made in the Pentateuch, for a start. Hitting some highlights, there was no Garden, no flood, no Patriarchs, no enslavement in Egypt, no Moses, no Exodus, no Israelite conquest of Canaan and no United Kingdom of David and Solomon. Consider yourself educated.
I guess the fact that the State of Israel exists this very moment is only the result of political actions and not due to the Abrahamic promise.
What part of "stay on topic" do you not understand?
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:31 PM   #90
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Pretty much every historical claim made in the Pentateuch, for a start. Hitting some highlights, there was no Garden, no flood, no Patriarchs, no enslavement in Egypt, no Moses, no Exodus, no Israelite conquest of Canaan and no United Kingdom of David and Solomon. Consider yourself educated.
I guess the fact that the State of Israel exists this very moment is only the result of political actions and not due to the Abrahamic promise.
As incredible as it may seem to you, that is, in fact, the case.

This is another topic, though. There are plenty of searchable threads in this forum regarding archaeological evidence (or lack therof) for the hsitorical claims of the Bible.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.