FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-21-2007, 09:24 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
So we are left to guess as to why you brought up that topic in this thread, while not addressing the topic of this thread.
Now, that *IS* strange.

Earlier you seemed to think that judge's post was spot-on topic for this thread:

But thank you for reminding the other contributors of what they should be concentrating their minds on

Seems like you switch arguments whenever you get your knickers in a twist. How sad.

Quote:
Some very anomalous behaviour here, with people seemingly unable to read properly!
Actually, the reading comprehension of the audience is fine.

The consistency level of your posts is pretty lame, though. Will you be working on that soon, hmm?
Sauron is offline  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:28 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
It must occur to impartial observers



Of course, why didn't I see it?
Thank god we have you here as an impartial observer.
judge is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 04:09 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
What is Surrey Man worrying about him for?
What does living in Surrey have to do with it?

1. You made a claim about evangelicals and their alleged pacifism - that is a claim that wasn't limited in geography.

2. Ray shot your claim down with a counterexample. As did I, and several others.

Ergo, whether George Bush impacts Ray in Surrey has nothing to do with whether or not your claims are a pile of bullshit - which they are.
I live in Surrey (England) now, but I used to live in Texas when Dubya was governor.

He was a terrible governor -- presiding over far more executions than his predecessors or peers, for example, and occasionally mocking the condemned instead of actually considering their cases -- and he is a worse president.

But no, where I currently live has no bearing on my opinion of Bush nor on the fact that this evangelical political leader is extremely violent in his policies.

Ray
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 04:48 AM   #34
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Moscow View Post
I live in Surrey (England)
When were you last attacked by evangelicals?
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 06:10 AM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post


Hi Clouseau. As I pointed out there are at least three NT canons.

1. The Ethiopic.

2. That used by the Church of the East.

3.That used by protestants and Catholics.

So despite you claims again there is no such thing as the NT canon.

As the reformers chose to reform the RCC, they kept their NT canon and implied quite clearly it was the correct one.

Can you explain why #3 is the correct one and not #1 or #2?
That's a good question. I am interested to see any reasons given?
empiricalDeity is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 06:35 AM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SashaTheMan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post


Hi Clouseau. As I pointed out there are at least three NT canons.

1. The Ethiopic.

2. That used by the Church of the East.

3.That used by protestants and Catholics.

So despite you claims again there is no such thing as the NT canon.

As the reformers chose to reform the RCC, they kept their NT canon and implied quite clearly it was the correct one.

Can you explain why #3 is the correct one and not #1 or #2?
Quote:
That's a good question.
In another thread, maybe.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 08:34 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 1,255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Moscow View Post
I live in Surrey (England)
When were you last attacked by evangelicals?
High school, I think. Many bullies turn out to have quite strong religious backgrounds.

However, for accounts of more recent and far deadlier attacks, you should ask some Iraqis. The US military is full of evangelicals, in case you didn't know.

Ray
Ray Moscow is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 08:47 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Moscow View Post
I live in Surrey (England)
When were you last attacked by evangelicals?
Again:

1. Your claim of evangelical pacifism -- now roundly refuted -- wasn't a claim limited in geography. Where Ray lives is irrelevant, to whether or not your statement is true.

2. Interestingly enough, I can't recall being attacked by the Roman Catholic Church. Hmm. Guess they must be pacifists, contrary to your handwaving. *



* It's almost embarrassing how easy it is to poke holes in Clouseau's arguments.
Note: I said "almost".
:rolling:
Sauron is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 08:52 AM   #39
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,918
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Moscow View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
When were you last attacked by evangelicals?
Quote:
High school, I think.
Really. So the streets and indeed schools of Surrey are quite safe, in this context, anyway, and the notion that evangelicals are even remotely as dangerous to good social order as medieval Catholic officials is utterly preposterous. It's ludicrous that we have even been discussing this.
Clouseau is offline  
Old 09-22-2007, 08:58 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the dark places of the world
Posts: 8,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clouseau View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Moscow View Post
Really. So the streets and indeed schools of Surrey are quite safe, in this context, anyway,
Uh, your claim did not say "Evangelicals in England are pacifist."
Your claim didn't limit any geography at all.

Not that it would matter - I already provided a link to a British evangelical society calling for violent resistance to govt policies. And of course, there's Oliver Cromwell and his reign of terror and persecution to consider.

Here in the New World, we have the so-called pacifist evangelicals in the American south: bible in one hand, lynch rope in the other. And let's not leave out the Manifest Destiny folks, evangelicals who assisted in wiping out native americans in the US and Canada, while claiming a god-given right to their land.

Quote:
and the notion that evangelicals are even remotely as dangerous to good social order as medieval Catholic officials is utterly preposterous.
1. The evidence and links I presented say otherwise.
2. Your ducking and dodging of the evidence speaks volumes as well.

Quote:
It's ludicrous that we have even been discussing this.
Naw. What's ludicrous is that you pretend to have a point, while simultaneously sticking your fingers in your ears and ignoring contrary evidence.
Sauron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.