FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-02-2008, 07:59 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
How come every time there is proof of the Gospels written by an outside source, atheists immediately pick it apart?
Your calling it proof doesn't make it proof of anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
What would constitute as evidence for you guys?
The other guys will have to speak for themselves. Here is what I mean when I ask for evidence: http://dougshaver.com/science/evolution/evol01.html
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:30 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
Miraculous darkness when Christ died for our sins
The darkness wasn't miraculous, it's called an eclipse.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:33 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paarsurrey View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
Miraculous darkness when Christ died for our sins
<edit. brevity>

No disrecspect to any religion or person is intended, this is just to express what I think to be right.

Thanks

I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
None taken, peace be upon you.
arnoldo is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:37 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullwind View Post

Why? The bible is full of stories about people who knew from first-hand experience that God existed, yet that knowledge didn't stop them from disobeying. Adam and Eve, for starters.

How would God revealing himself "force" anyone to obey him?
So if you won't obey God, why should he show up and appear to you?

Just so you can go "Oh Hey God! Nope sorry, still not worshiping though. Nice effort though buddy."
If free will is so important to you then they should be given that option, don't you agree? And as you say, revealing himself wouldn't force anyone to worship him, but a lot of people would, though. Wouldn't that be a good thing?
Gullwind is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 08:45 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,234
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
This would VIOLATE free will of either WANTING to receive God's will or being FORCED to obey God's will.
.....you really don't get it, do you???! Free will goes out the fucking window when BibleGod backs up even the most minor blessings with threats of sanity-destroying atrocity. "Believe in me, do everything I tell you to do, love me so obsessively you think not with common human compassion but with inflexible zealotry, or I will torture you forever in the most diabolical torture chamber imaginable."

--that's not "respecting free will", that's flat-out psychological abuse NB
Nero's Boot is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 09:32 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Let's say that there was an eclipse in 32 AD, just for the sake of argument.

How does that help you? Your own 'gospel' says that John the Baptist got himself arrested for denouncing the marriage of Herod Antipas and the widow of his brother Phillip, Herodias. Although Josephus says nothing about the marriage as the reason for his arrest he does confirm that JtB was killed by Antipas. Now, with Josephus' regrettable tendency to digression there is no way to precisely date when JtB was killed (Josephus puts it in a discussion of events which happened no earlier than 35!) but

Quote:
3:18Then with many other exhortations he preached good news to the people,
3:19but Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias, his brother's wife, and for all the evil things which Herod had done,
3:20added this also to them all, that he shut up John in prison.

Of course, in order to marry Phillip's widow, Phillip of necessity, had to be dead and Josephus tells us:

Quote:
6. About this time it was that Philip, Herod's ' brother, departed this life, in the twentieth year of the reign of Tiberius,
.

(Antiquities of the Jews Book XVIII, Ch. 4, #6)

As Tiberius came to the throne in 14 AD upon the death of Augustus we can add 14 and 20 and find out that Phillip died sometime in 34 AD....which is already 2 years after your eclipse. Odd, eh?

Part ( a big part) of your problem is that christians can't seem to place their god boy firmly in time. Matthew indicates he was born before 4 BC....Luke insists he was born after 6 AD...Mark and John don't seem to care either way.
Nor can you figure out just when, exactly, he is supposed to have died. Pilate was praefect for 10 years but we don't seem to have any indication which of those ten years might have been the one where the dirty deed was done....if it was done at all.

Frankly, I would expect such vagueness from a mythical creation who was written into the record later on by different authors.

In any case, Luke and Matthew cite the arrest of JtB as the triggering event for jesus so-called ministry getting off the ground. JtB could hardly have been arrested prior to 34 as he would have been denouncing the wedding of a man to his brother's widow when that man was not yet dead.

Yes, in 32, if Luke and Matthew are right, your Jesus would have been building bookshelves in the carpentry shop and would look up and say "Shit....it's getting dark!" (He wouldn't say "Jesus Christ, it's getting dark" because in 32 he was a nobody.) So, perhaps Thallus (if he ever existed) was speaking of an actual eclipse....or later writers did not know the date any better than you and simply got it wrong.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 01:54 PM   #37
Iasion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hiya,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Life View Post
Just HOW MANY sources would've convinced you?
Well, how many do you have ?
Zero.

Many writers COULD have mentioned it :
Philo Judaeus
Valerius Maximus
Marcus Manilius
Hero(n) of Alexandria
Geminus
Plutarch
Pliny the Elder
Josephus
Epictetus
Theon of Smyrna
Pliny the Younger
Tacitus
Suetonius
Ptolemy
Marcus Aurelius
Aulus Gellius

NONE of these writers mentioned the darkness.

Thallus didn't - he merely mentioned a known eclipse as an eclipse.
Phlegon didn't - he merely mentioned a known eclipse as an eclipse.


So far you have ZERO evidence.


Iasion
 
Old 03-02-2008, 02:26 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,041
Default

Go here for all your eclipse needs: http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/JSEX/JSEX-AS.html

As you can see, eclipses very often, maybe not total, but at least partial - so a historian recording some darkness in 32AD is barely noteworthy or miraculous...
crispy is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 03:18 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

For all who are not yet aware, Half-Life has clearly announced a significant change of heart, so let us all be on our best behaviour, as he collects his thoughts, and allow him get himself oriented to his new perspective.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 03-02-2008, 03:44 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Okay. I'll help.


Here you go, H/L. I've always loved this one.

http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...ier/kooks.html

Quote:
Kooks and Quacks of the Roman Empire: A Look into the World of the Gospels (1997)
Minimalist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.