Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-13-2005, 07:16 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Also, I noted several people didn't like the graphical frame (or stone background). What would be an alternative?
best, Peter Kirby |
01-13-2005, 07:42 PM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 6,610
|
Quote:
Well, my only complaint has been handled. I can read the at a glance box. And I like the frame. *puts up her dukes to anyone that says otherwise* |
|
01-14-2005, 10:46 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
|
On my screen, the "E" in "Early Christian Writings" is partially chopped off. Also, I still think that the title "Book of Matthew" is too prominent.
RED DAVE |
01-14-2005, 11:13 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Hi Red Dave,
I'm guessing that your screen resolution and/or browser width is small, such as 640x480. Statistics today are that those with a 640x480 screen are about 2% of Internet users and dropping. Increasing browser width (and screen size) at least to 800x600 would let one view a lot of sites better. (Including IIDB.) Also, this web page is about the Gospel of Matthew. There will be 155 other pages that are about those texts. And there will be a homepage that will, of course, not have the name of a particular document in large print at the top. Lastly, I am truly interested in any ideas for another look (with similar functionality), given that there have been half a dozen requests for a less graphic-heavy design like the one linked above. best, Peter Kirby |
01-14-2005, 12:43 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: AZ, u.s.a.
Posts: 1,202
|
I'm not really sure what the ratings in the "At a Glance" are telling me [eg. "(3) ***" out of, what, 5? 10? 100?]. Perhaps that could be cleared up [I see there will probably be some sort of explanatory page linked to it in the future; but maybe a (3/10) or something for quicker reference]. You can probably tell I'm reaching for something to 'fault.'
[IOW, bang-up job, mate!] |
01-14-2005, 02:27 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
|
Very nice. One little aesthetic comment, I don't like the Crucifix to the right of the title, it's a bit naff. Either have nothing or have some image taken from a genuine old cross of the time, perhaps something that would have been tooled on the cover of a contemporary codex.
|
01-21-2005, 11:38 AM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 6
|
Peter Kirby,
The site looks very nice and appears to have some very good potential as a well-used reference and info site. Good job! Kudos! Terry |
01-22-2005, 01:51 AM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
|
Thanks from me too for your contribution to humanity wrt research on Christianity.
As someone in the third world, where bandwidth can be an issue, I suggest you remove the background image (the brick wall) and instead use a background colour of your choice: the image takes time to load and we already have quite a number of images in the page. (I have this problem with Ebla - which I can only surf comfortably over the weekends when traffic is low) Whats that (evolve)fish doing at the lower left hand corner of the wooden frame? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|