![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			If Jesus' body was laid in the tomb, would it have been acceptable for the gospels to have said he was "buried", as Paul does?  The gospels never say Jesus was buried.  Paul says Jesus was buried.  I think of being buried as meaning covered up with dirt.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	ted  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2003 
				Location: Eagle River, Alaska 
				
				
					Posts: 7,816
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The author of Acts 2:29 used "buried" to refer to placement in a "sepulchre" so I would guess there is no incompatibility.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2005 
				Location: Midwest 
				
				
					Posts: 4,787
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 I might point out that even in English burying the dead does not necessarily imply dirt; one can be buried in a mausoleum, for example, above the ground (see this page about St. Joseph Cemetary for an instance of the English phrase buried in a mausoleum). Ben.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 ted  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |