Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-09-2003, 06:06 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 855
|
Joel,
Thank you for the info, I've only read a few books on Biblical scholarship, one being Friedman's book, which I found to be quite enjoyable. Another was book comparing various Middle Eastern and Near Eastern mythologies and trying to explain possible origins of Biblical stories (Tim Callahan's Secret Origins of the Bible), which, while quite enjoyable, I found to have some problems, such as the common use of the phrase, "there is no evidence to suggest otherwise" in too many situations. I'll have to check out The Pentateuch when I get a chance. Actually I've also read Asimov's book, but I don't know if I consider that to be serious biblical scholarship, as it just seems to be more or less of an overview of The Bible, and doesn't go into depth about any specific issues. Thanks again for the information. Dave |
10-16-2003, 09:25 AM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
|
Additional suggestions?
Quote:
I am currently working on something on the demise of the Documentary Hypothesis, but it won't be up for a good few months owing to real-life commitments. Real life commitments-I know the feeling... |
|
10-17-2003, 12:57 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
Re: Additional suggestions?
Quote:
0. It Ain't Necessarily So by Matthew Sturgis (a popularisation, but an extremely easy read) 1. Laughlin 2. Finkelstein & Silberman 3. Dever 4. Lemche 5. Zevitt (only if you're not sick of the topic by now) For the Pentateuch/Torah/Herew Bible, Blenkinsopp is a much better introduction than Friedman (though it presupposes some familiarity, and is not a popularisation), in terms of getting a good idea of the state of the field of Pentateuchal studies. So in order of reading, if one were to examine the Pentateuch, I'd get: 1. Boadt 1a. Friedman 2. McKenzie & Graham 2a. Blenkinsopp With those, you'll have as good an understanding of the Pentateuch as I do. You could also look up the relevant entries (J, E, D, P, Documentary Hypothesis, Supplementary Hypothesis, Fragmentary Hypothesis, chiasmus, toledot, etc.) in the Anchor Bible Dictionary at a nearby library. I've been meaning to get my hands on R.N. Whybray and a few others as well who present alternative views. Apikorus and DrJim are the ones to ask for additional recommendations. Joel |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|