FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2004, 07:54 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Wonder
The way to change the definition of a word is to use it in the new definition. How do you suppose faith became a near synonym of trust?
Because ordinary people often used "faith" to mean "trust without previous evidence".
Shortly said. A longer definition and explanation could be given, but maybe that's enough for the moment.
Quote:
Equivocating Christians would be my guess.
I doubt it.
We could look up the Latin writings pre-100 A.D., or look at how Indians use English in India (and it's used a lot) to see if there is any difference.
But I doubt Christians had much to do with it.
It has been popularized in a religious sense by Christians -- but they seem to have taken a pre-existing term and used it in an over-extended way to mean only religious faith for the most part, which is different from what you're saying.
Quote:
You want a precise definition in accordance with popular usage. You can't have both.
I do well enough, I think, when I actually give the explanations, as I've done here, and any confusion gets cleared up in questions and answers.
Life is itself complex, especially human concerns, which makes for a messy language. But one does one's best.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:01 PM   #32
DBT
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Wonder
Me too. Even "believe" is nearly gone from my vocabulary, replaced by "think."

Me too, the words faith and belief have become obnoxious.
DBT is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:04 PM   #33
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

*shrug*
I find the realities behind the words "Nazi", "Holocaust", "Stalinist", "rape" etc. etc. to be extremely obnoxious --- yet I still use the words if I wish to describe the concepts behind them.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:05 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBT
Me too, the words faith and belief have become obnoxious.
Heh. Yesterday I met an atheist/agnostic named "Christian," poor guy. I suppose there must be a least one atheist woman named "Faith", that's gotta suck.
Godless Wonder is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:07 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,997
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Wonder
Me too. Even "believe" is nearly gone from my vocabulary, replaced by "think."
Ditto. Although sometimes when I discuss with friends what they "believe", I find that they are really talking about what they "wish" or "hope" to be true and that belief has very little to do with their position.
reprise is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 08:11 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurdur
*shrug*
I find the realities behind the words "Nazi", "Holocaust", "Stalinist", "rape" etc. etc. to be extremely obnoxious --- yet I still use the words if I wish to describe the concepts behind them.
But you don't say "i am a Nazi" or "I am a Stalinist."

I try not to say "I believe," but instead "I think" or "I'm pretty sure" as these are always more accurate for me, and, "I have faith that...." just doesn't even begin to sprout from my brain. I'm not saying that the word faith or belief should be eliminated. I'm saying that faith should be put into the same box as the words Nazi and Holocaust and Stalinist. "Faith" should be given the reputation it deserves.
Godless Wonder is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 10:42 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hiding from Julian ;)
Posts: 5,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurdur
Redefining the English language is not going to work.
We have to address how realworld people actually talk and think.
Abso-fucking-lotely. :notworthy I'm tired of people trying to redefine words just because it offends or disagrees with them - if it's so bad, use another word. Not even George Bernard Shaw was able to forcefully redefine our language, and I reckon he had a fair bit more influence than most of us do.
Corona688 is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 11:40 PM   #38
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 15,576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurdur
Example: assume I have a (sexual and emotional) partner.
I might have complete faith in her, and faith she would not betray me.
Since I am not actually going on anything that constitutes scientific evidence leading to proof, it is faith.
Faith gets used a lot in daily life --- trust without evidence between people.

IOW, the limiting of faith to describe only religious faith is already a bad start.
You would be better off criticising how the religious can abuse faith, which is where they are really vulnerable.
It's not dishonest to have faith unless you defend the faith thingy dishonestly --- unles you ignore the evidence. And it is on that point where the religious are extremely vulnerable.
Gurdur,

I had a thread a while back that discussed faith. Someone mentioned differentiating faith from trust. I will try to find it. I'd like to see what you think.

Regards
Soul Invictus is offline  
Old 07-24-2004, 06:53 AM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
Gurdur,

I had a thread a while back that discussed faith. Someone mentioned differentiating faith from trust. I will try to find it. I'd like to see what you think.
Regards
Thanks,
I would indeed be very interested in a full-bore discussion on the topic and your thread.
I find the area quite interesting, especially since it was one of the questions I had to consider when I was writing a bit on just how did religion originate.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 07-24-2004, 07:37 AM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godless Wonder
But you don't say "i am a Nazi" or "I am a Stalinist."
I am a Stalinist with regards to rhubarb.
I firmly believe that rhubarb is simply natural evil and should be always taken outside and shot.

Apart from the point that I really dislike rhubarb (and aspic),
in daily life I would say,
"Yeah, I know I don't know this particular person well, but I have faith she/he won't cheat me"
Most of the time my business or social faith gets justified later; sometimes it doesn't.
Quote:
I'm saying that faith should be put into the same box as the words Nazi and Holocaust and Stalinist. "Faith" should be given the reputation it deserves.
That's a whole 'nother debate.
I don't see Quakers or Canandian Methodists (now celebtrating gay unions in their churches) as being anything at all like Nazis.
I've known neonazis (and fought them), I know their propaganda and SOP's, and there's a world of difference to liberal, nicey-nicey Christians.
I am an atheist, and I tend not to like Christianity at all, even in the liberal versions, but I do recognise there's a world of difference between some liberal, bunny-hugging, tree-loving, gay-accepting Christian who uses the word "faith" in silly ways, and a neoNazi or Nazi.
Like, I'm bloody sure which I would prefer anywhere near me, if I was given the choice.
Sure, I really dislike fundy Christians (worse than rhubarb, too), but I don't lump in all Christians together.
In practical terms, all Christians simply don't share the same ideology.
There's a world of difference between USA Church of Christ and Canadian Methodist.
OTOH, all neonazis do share pretty much the same ideology in practice, and the same with the old Nazis.
Gurdur is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.