FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2005, 02:46 PM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthodox_Freethinker
Given that they cannot trace themselves to the first century, they are obviously wrong.
Again, all of them can go backwards on the graph you presented, or on another graph. All Christian sects can be traced back to the first century.

Quote:
Given that Orthodoxy has remained uncorrupted from the beginning of the faith, this claim is false.
So, they claim that what you call "Orthodoxy" has not remained uncorrupted. They say your claims are false.

We're left with a "he said-she said" dilemma.

Quote:
This isn't a regurgitation of dogma but historical fact. Christianity was one and undivided until the Great Schism.
Christianity was quite divided even in the First Century, and even more so in the next couple of centuries. "Orthodoxy" began when one particular sect won out over the others.

Your view of the history of the Christian faith is distorted by the "orthodox" dogma of your particular sect, which emerged from the victors like most of the rest of the sects we see today.
Mageth is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:52 PM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthodox_Freethinker
Historically, the Orthodox Church is the Church as founded by Christ and the Apostles. Any other church is only a tangent of Orthodoxy:



Any questions?

Peace.
Yes..where does the Assyrian Church of the East fit in?
judge is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:54 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Land of Make Believe
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthodox_Freethinker
The Bible does not err on matters of theology, theological truth and the essentials of salvation. The Scriptures are not, however, a scientific textbook.
Okay, so the Bible is not meant to be a science book. But why couldn't the all powerful God at least get the science claims within it right? Again, it's a very easy thing to get done, especially for an all powerful God.

Furthermore, I would say the Bible is not at all clear on matters of theology and the essentials of salvation. Christians have debated for 2000 years the correct understanding of Christian theology and the essentials of salvation, and their main source for this is the Bible. Don't resort to the "yeah but my church has it right." Discuss why there is such confusion amongst various Christian sects on Christian theology and interpreting the Bible.
[/QUOTE]
motorhead is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:40 PM   #44
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
Again, all of them can go backwards on the graph you presented, or on another graph. All Christian sects can be traced back to the first century.
No, that is not true. Protestantism began about 1500 years after the first century while Orthodoxy began within the first century. There is an obvious difference.

Peace.
Orthodox_Freethinker is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:44 PM   #45
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead
But why couldn't the all powerful God at least get the science claims within it right?
[/QUOTE]

Because, again, the Bible is not a science textbook. If young earth creationism is all that Moses had available to him, then so be it.
The Bible is right, however, that the universe is not eternal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead
Christians have debated for 2000 years the correct understanding of Christian theology and the essentials of salvation, and their main source for this is the Bible.
[/QUOTE]

The Orthodox Church has existed from before the New Testament was even written. The Orthodox Church, with the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, wrote the New Testament. Therefore, if any Church understands salvation, it is ours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead
Discuss why there is such confusion amongst various Christian sects on Christian theology and interpreting the Bible.
[/QUOTE]

Because they are all competing sects even though there is only supposed to be one Church.

Peace.
Orthodox_Freethinker is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:46 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: somewhere near Allentown, PA
Posts: 2,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthodox_Freethinker
But they could not historically trace their sect to Christ and the Apostles.

Peace.
Huh???? Joe Blow just invented a religion and called it christianity? How are YOU qualified to tell us what's valid and what isn't? Do you know anything about the history of the christian church? The Roman Catholic church WAS the only christian church for centuries. Would you claim they were invalid? If so, then there WAS no christian church for quite some time. (god just took a long nap?) The eastern orthodox churches split from them, and much later, so did the protestants. ALL christian churches came from the same early church. They just evolved in different directions.

-Ubercat
Ubercat is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:55 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: somewhere near Allentown, PA
Posts: 2,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orthodox_Freethinker
Look, it seems as if you've never even heard of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Orthodoxy began in 52 A.D., when the Apostles receieved the blessing of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost. It has remained unchanged and uncorrupted from that time. Every other Christian denomination is nothing more than an off-shoot of Orthodoxy. For example, Protestantism has only been around for 500 years and therefore, it cannot be the original Christian Church. Do you understand better now?

Peace.
Wow, so they've been wearing those ridiculous huge robes, and carrying those gaudy, jewel encrusted crucifixes and shephards whatshamashizits since 52 AD? And all those silly rituals were invented then and haven't changed since? I AM impressed. :notworthy

-Ubercat
Ubercat is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:59 PM   #48
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubercat
The Roman Catholic church WAS the only christian church for centuries. Would you claim they were invalid?
No, of course not. As the chart demonstrates, the Roman and Eastern Church were one, undivided Church for the first thousand years of the faith. Sadly, we have been separated from that time, showing the mistakes of fallible humans. I have nothing against Catholicism and I attend Catholic mass rather often. My mother happens to be Catholic.
It is Protestantism, and particularly fundamentalism, that I am not entirely fond of.

Peace.
Orthodox_Freethinker is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 04:00 PM   #49
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubercat
Wow, so they've been wearing those ridiculous huge robes, and carrying those gaudy, jewel encrusted crucifixes and shephards whatshamashizits since 52 AD?
Those are external things, not Orthodox theological teaching.

Peace.
Orthodox_Freethinker is offline  
Old 12-01-2005, 04:41 PM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Orthodox_Freethinker

How can you call yourself a FREETHINKER?

Kindly lookup the meaning of the word.
NOGO is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.