FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-05-2007, 06:26 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
I have interpreted wiki's statement about Iberia as agreeing that Paul writing in Greek in the first century should have used Iberia - unless he had a strangely educated scribe or this is an example of this Pauline school that has been proposed.

What are the possible explanations for this? Is one that this letter is much later than assumed?
You are not listening (or reading). 1 Maccabees establishes that Spania can be used in Greek. No matter what (your reading of) Wiki says.

Ben.
Ben C Smith is offline  
Old 11-05-2007, 11:35 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Something has gone wrong in translation here - I am agreeing Spania looks OK!
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.