Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-28-2005, 05:52 PM | #11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Greetings judge et al,
Quote:
The earliest Christians show no clear knowledge of the Gospels or even their contents. (I do not count spiritual references to the Risen Christ, a la Paul.) Here is my rough list of early Christian writings (dated approx. to the decade) which show no knowledge of the Gospels or their stories : Paul (50s) Hebrews (60s) James (80s) 1 John (80s) Paul2 (80-90s) 1 Peter (90s) 1 Clement (90s) Revelation (90s) Didakhe (100s) Jude (100s) 2,3 John (120s) ap.Peter (120s) preachPeter (120s) 2 Peter (130s) Pastorals (130s) g.Peter (130s) Mathetes (140s) 2 Clement (140s) dial.Saviour (150s) g.Mary (150s) And some writings whihc help to show the development of the Gospels : Barnabas (110s) - earliest mention of "pierced". Papias (130s) - first mentions of proto-Gospels. Hermas (130s) - first mention of the empty tomb. Epistle of the Apostles (140s) - some Gospel stories, 1st mention of virgin Mary Ignatius (130s?) - claims that Jesus was "truly" crucified etc. - 1st mention of Pilate. Marcion (140s) - early proto Gospel. Justin (150s) - mentions the anonymous "memoirs of the apostles" also called "Gospels". 1st to quote Gospel material at length (not quite like our modern copies.) Aristides (138-161) - describes the Gospel as being preached "a short time". Irenaeus (180s) - 1st to name the Gospels. I think the evidence is pretty clear - the Gospels and their stories were unknown in 1st century, arose during the early 2nd century, developed over the mid 2nd century, then were finalised in late 2nd century. Iasion |
|
06-29-2005, 09:44 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St Louis Metro East
Posts: 1,046
|
Quote:
|
|
06-29-2005, 10:20 AM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
|
|
06-29-2005, 02:14 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Why am I still up? It's way past my bedtime.
Posts: 508
|
Another tangent
You've done gospels mentioned by date. What about attempting to reconstruct the gospels from quotes. What is the earliest date that we can reconstruct the gospels (as we have them now) from quotes? Or come close enough to them to say they existed in final form by that date?
Side note: didn't Josh McDowel quote some guy from the 1700s who asked just this sort of question and claims that he could do it by the second century? |
06-29-2005, 03:36 PM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
See for example the reference to Matthew's birth narrative in 'To the Ephesians' to Matthew's account of Jesus' baptism in 'To the Smyrnaeans' and to Matthew 10:16 in To Polycarp'. Andrew Criddle |
|
06-29-2005, 04:14 PM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Quote:
best wishes, Peter Kirby |
|
06-29-2005, 04:17 PM | #17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Quote:
However, I disagree with the assumption that one can push the date of a document forward to the earliest demonstrated reference to it. best wishes, Peter Kirby |
|
06-29-2005, 04:18 PM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
The Pastorals knew Luke, and were probably written by him, or a person in his community.
|
06-29-2005, 04:20 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
Why would we expect Paul to have quoted the gospels? |
|
06-29-2005, 05:35 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|