Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-27-2012, 08:49 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I have published ALL the relevant references to Genesis 1:26 in Clement in another thread. It is stupid to develop an argument like you do. We can't start with what Clement SHOULD believe IF he were orthodox. We have to deal with what IS and Clement says over and over again that the first creation was according to the image and later with Jesus according to the likeness. Marqe (= Mark) in the Mimar Book Four speaks in terms of a creation according to BARA (= to make, create, form) at the beginning and QARA (= to call, proclaim etc.) in the end but it is an identical formulation in all other respects.
|
02-27-2012, 09:01 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Here is one passage from the Mimar Book Four (the chapter is even more explicit):
Quote:
|
|
02-27-2012, 09:12 AM | #13 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
02-27-2012, 09:13 AM | #14 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Maybe that wasn't explicit enough. Here is some of what follows. First with respect to the material in Deuteronomy which we noted Clement and Marqe think leads to perfection:
Quote:
In any event it is only in the next chapter - the one that deals with the 'perfect work' (tamym po'olo) that we see the twofold perfection process brought forward. A small sample: Quote:
|
||
02-27-2012, 09:15 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
My best friend in the world Rory Boid has unmatched expertise in things Samaritan. He is open to an (early) second century dating for Marqe. The idea that the Samaritans took up Clement's invention and then adopted for themselves is ridiculous.
|
02-27-2012, 09:17 AM | #16 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
Quote:
Where is the twofold process in the Tanakh, where it matters? |
|||
02-27-2012, 09:22 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Why are the opinions of the Jews superior to those of the Samaritans? Exegesis is what matters to Jews, exegesis is what matters to Samaritans.
|
02-27-2012, 09:53 AM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
|
It's not a matter of tribe; it's a matter of catholicity, rather. One must source theology to origin; to when there were only united Israelites, not Samaritans. There is no biblical support for two stage creation of the nature of mankind, except in a way that is undesirable. After the Fall, Genesis states, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil." So, humanity is already fully made in the image of God. It's just that humanity has used that characteristic differently from God. Clement was very heretical indeed.
|
02-27-2012, 09:56 AM | #19 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
In another section of the Mimar we see perhaps an explanation of the twofold perfection process that starts with BARA and ends with QARA. I must thank the people participating in this forum for I wouldn't have seen this if I hadn't engaged them. The answer Marqe seems to give has to do with divine blessings which he notes always precede the taking of the 'kingdom.'
The question that occupies Marqe is the question of the blessing and whether the blessing they made could have been heard by 600,000 Israelites. If you look carefully Marqe seems to apply these events to what will happen in the future with the coming of the messiah (= Ta'eb). He starts with the observation that Genesis begins with a Blessing and then is followed by a curse and notes the same at the time of Noah and throughout the Pentateuch and then continues: Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-27-2012, 10:08 AM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Notice also that Marqe immediately goes back to the narrative of Jacob's vision seeing yesh (= the glory) and being transformed. The idea here is that in the future the contemporary Israelites whom Marqe is addressing will 'see God' and receiving a blessing (and presumably receive baptism at one time cf. Dositheans):
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|