Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-17-2007, 01:00 PM | #31 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
05-17-2007, 01:53 PM | #32 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
What did Paul know about Jesus? He doesn't record any prophecies by Jesus.
The Temple was destroyed in 70, but there was enough left of Jewish nationalism to mount another revolt. Discussions are never closed, especially when there are no clear answers. The discussion may be split off. |
05-17-2007, 02:10 PM | #33 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,635
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-17-2007, 03:18 PM | #34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Jews or, more specifically, Jews who had been cast out of Jerusalem? Not necessarily, but I do think his audience knew such people and knew what had happened. Of course, I generally accept the common dating of Mark to around the time of the event in question.
|
05-18-2007, 01:15 AM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Google "Febble" if you need to find me.
Posts: 6,547
|
No answers? Or do they come in another thread?
|
05-18-2007, 02:00 AM | #36 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
I would like answers to the answerable questions, and I would like the unanswerable questions ("Is the post-Jewish War dating of the Synoptic Gospels due to a Christian bias, a secular bias, or to the flatulence of Westcott and Hort one day at Cambridge, or....?") to be left by the wayside.
What should be put forward in this thread is appropriate material for a FAQ. And I'm not the one with all the answers. |
05-18-2007, 09:39 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
|
I have a few questions about the "Lord."
There is no mention of the divine name Yahweh in the LXX or the NT. It looks to me like all references to the name Yahweh in the LXX were replaced with the title “Lord.” I can see in verses like Romans 10:9-13 and Romans 14:8-11 that some authors were (or at least ‘one author was’) completely unaware of the god behind the title. So my questions are:
|
05-18-2007, 11:13 AM | #38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Google "Febble" if you need to find me.
Posts: 6,547
|
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2007, 10:18 PM | #39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
Quote:
How is it you (and you can be just representative if you like) can place the gospel of Mark as early as 65AD (presumably advocating mark 13 as a later interpolation?) but you can't place it as early as say, 40 AD? What specific facts and evidence makes you say 65 AD is the earliest possible date? |
|
05-18-2007, 10:31 PM | #40 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Quote:
I place Mark between 70 and 73 CE. The "65 to 80" waffle is a conflation of consensus opinions. I suppose, since you and Riverwind are pressing me on this point, that it deserves a new thread. I can't expect getting much love for my opinion on Mark's date, but I will expect some respect for it being more reasonable than any other similarly narrow range. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|