Freethought & Rationalism Archive

FathomFFI · 06-19-2008, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toto

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gospel

Here is a relevant video on YouTube.

Is Jesus God? - Deedat vs Sjoberg 1 of 30

...

How is it relevant? I am not going to watch this now, but I think I have seen Deedat on tape. This particular issue is the one that divides Muslims and Christians - was Jesus human or God?

Does this particular video shed some light on the interpretation of John 10:30?

ETA: This youtube video seems directly on point. But I would prefer to have text to read.

His video is not relevant. I know it.

I have looked at your video, and it comes close to what I am saying, but where Deedat failed was not in understanding that the response Jesus gave in John 10.35 - 36 does not address the accusation in John 10.34 of him being "God," but only addresses an accusation of him referring to himself as a god.

If it's really "God," then the reply of Jesus is non sequitur. Also, if is really is "God," then the Jews understood his statement in John 10.30 as him claiming to be God, and that confutes Deedat's definition of John 10.30.

Gospel · 06-19-2008, 08:13 PM

At least I was close.

Again, pardon the drive by.

FathomFFI · 06-19-2008, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gospel

At least I was close.

Again, pardon the drive by.

No, you were not. It was toto's video that was relevant.

Gospel · 06-19-2008, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FathomFFI

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gospel

At least I was close.

Again, pardon the drive by.

No, you were not. It was toto's video that was relevant.

What Toto posted has the same individual speaking the same argument. Only difference is "my" Video was in 30 parts and I (obviously) made the mistake in believing I was be courteous by linking you to the beginning.

But yeah, go on and believe "my" Video had nothing to do with Toto's.

PS: Still, Pardon the drive by.

FathomFFI · 06-19-2008, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gospel

Quote:

Originally Posted by FathomFFI

No, you were not. It was toto's video that was relevant.

What Toto posted has the same individual speaking the same argument. Only difference is "my" Video was in 30 parts and I (obviously) made the mistake in believing I was be courteous by linking you to the beginning.

But yeah, go on and believe "my" Video had nothing to do with Toto's.

PS: Still, Pardon the drive by.

Okay, so to find something that talks for just a few seconds, I should watch every video for the next 2 hours??

Not happening, and they aren't relative.

Gospel · 06-19-2008, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FathomFFI

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gospel

What Toto posted has the same individual speaking the same argument. Only difference is "my" Video was in 30 parts and I (obviously) made the mistake in believing I was be courteous by linking you to the beginning.

But yeah, go on and believe "my" Video had nothing to do with Toto's.

PS: Still, Pardon the drive by.

Okay, so to find something that talks for just a few seconds, I should watch every video for the next 2 hours??

Not happening, and they aren't relative.

I can respect that.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

06-19-2008, 08:13 PM	#52
Gospel Regular Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: United States, FL Posts: 138	At least I was close. Again, pardon the drive by.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.