FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-2011, 12:31 PM   #51
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

As an example of the sort of thing educated people in the Empire would accept as history, Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras chapter 28 may be of interest.
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 07-19-2011, 01:09 PM   #52
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Thank you Andrew, much appreciated....

avi
avi is offline  
Old 07-19-2011, 03:42 PM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
As an example of the sort of thing educated people in the Empire would accept as history, Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras chapter 28 may be of interest.
It must be remembered that educated people like Justin Martyr, Theophilus of Antioch, and Athenagoras did NOT worship man as a God.

This is the very SIGNIFICANT DISTINCTION of Jesus believers of antiquity. They do not worship men as Gods.

When Jesus was made the NEW GOD of the Roman Empire diefication of the Roman Emperors ceased.

Neither the Jews, educated or not, or believers in God, educated or not, worshiped men as Gods neither BELIEVED men were DIVINE. See "On Embassy to Gaius" by Philo and "To Autolycus 1.XI.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 09:01 AM   #54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
As an example of the sort of thing educated people in the Empire would accept as history, Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras chapter 28 may be of interest.
I'm curious -- why would we assume that the tolerance-for-myth of the author of Genesis is necessarily greater-than-or-equal-to that of educated people in the Empire?

It would seem that that assumption is based on the "people get less and less credulous as time goes by" model of religious development, which is no longer considered sound.
davidstarlingm is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 11:36 AM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidstarlingm View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
As an example of the sort of thing educated people in the Empire would accept as history, Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras chapter 28 may be of interest.
I'm curious -- why would we assume that the tolerance-for-myth of the author of Genesis is necessarily greater-than-or-equal-to that of educated people in the Empire?

It would seem that that assumption is based on the "people get less and less credulous as time goes by" model of religious development, which is no longer considered sound.
I'm not sure that that assumption is being made.

I was discussing how the Gospels compare to other narratives of roughly the same period dealing with people with supposed supernatural abillities.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.