Sheshbazzar

But if 'Justin's' writings were actually forged at a latter date it doesn't matter what you assert they are COMPATIBLE with, they would still be forgeries.


You do know I'm just pulling yer tail don'cha aa?

Heck, I'd have to be, as you well know that I posit that all of these NT writings, Paul included, actually had their genesis in Jewish midrashim from the BC era.
With additional 'Christian' horse shit being heaped on top for centuries.

EVERYONE is a victim of the Church of Rome, THE GREAT WHORE OF BABYLON who sits on many waters, and is drunken with the blood of the saints.
And the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her whoredoms.

aa5874

You are NOT presenting any actual evidence just what you imagine.

It is a fact that the Roman Church Forged writings under the name of your "Bullneck" Constantine so I don't understand why all of a sudden you seem incapable of understanding that writings may have been forged under the name of Eusebius who was not even the Emperor or Bishop of Rome.

aa5874

Your post is all rhetoric. Nothing at all you claim can be substantiated because you neither have C 14 or Paleography to support you.

You use the writing of Julian but become irate when I use Justin.

Did NOT the writings of Julian pass through the hands of the Forgery Mill??

aa5874

I really don't care what you do with the writings of Justin. All I know is that we have DATED RECOVERED Manuscripts that destroy and obliterate any argument that the Jesus story and cult started in the 4th century.

And what about the wretched Eusebius and Constantine??

Now that it has been proven that the Church of Rome did FORGE writings and that Constantine was a victim why don't you understand that Eusebius may NOT have forged the TF???

Sheshbazzar

I've already went my rounds with MM on that. I certainly don't accept that the Jesus story and cult started in the 4th century.

And of course as you should well know by now, I also don't accept that the Jesus story and cult started in the 2nd century.

'EVERYONE' means EVERYONE, ...wretched Eusebius and Constantine, Protestantism, Me and you included.

NO ONE has escaped being victimized and tainted by the lies and pollutions of THE GREAT WHORE OF BABYLON, The Church of Rome.

Yup. Wasn't my argument anyway. But can you convince mountainman?

aa5874

At this point, I am not interested in any more imagination stories about what you BELIEVE WITHOUT a shred of evidence.

I AM DEALING WITH THE DATED NT MANUSCRIPTS.

Sheshbazzar

As mountainman would ask manuscrips DATED by whom? A bunch of professional Christian theologians? That is your 'evidence'? impressive.

Why not just let the friggin Pope date 'em for you and be done with it.

aa5874

Paleography is Not related to Christian theology or Theologians. Thousands of Non-Christian texts are dated by Paleography and are used and accepted universally.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palaeography

You want me to Reject Paleography and accept what you imagine. May I remind you that your stories based on imagination are essentially fiction.

Sheshbazzar

Time will tell.

aa5874

Two thousand years is enough. You seem to enjoy being a Victim of the Church of Rome.

Once you read and analyze the "Donation of Constantine", "Church History" and "Against Heresies" then it becomes rather easy to deduce that the Church of Rome most likely did NOT compose Justin' works..