FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-2011, 09:06 PM   #81
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

delete.
judge is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 09:32 PM   #82
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
First get some crazy idea about mythicism, even though there is no trace of anyone having this view until relatively recently. I mean it's suspiciously absent from the entire corpus of early christianity, until someone such as yourself suddenly sees it.
It's present throughout the entire corpus of early Christianity, judge. That is Earl's point. And note that Earl has made a point of not claiming interpolations for the tiny number of passages that may cause problems with his thesis. He usually attempts to show that even though there is good evidence for interpolation, it isn't necessary to his thesis to regard them as interpolations.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 09:41 PM   #83
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It is the failure of HJers to present an "historical Jesus" for the last 200 years why the MJ theory has now taken over.

.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMkth8FWno
judge is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 09:49 PM   #84
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
It's present throughout the entire corpus of early Christianity, judge. That is Earl's point.
Um no its not. There I just refuted your ridiculous assertion with an equally strong one.

What is present throughout early christian corpus is a human earthly flesh and blood man who was born, ate drank who lived and died on earth.

In other words the early christian documents know nothing of Earl's invention.
The only place it has any credibility is on the internet amongst amatuers.

Tough eh?
judge is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 09:52 PM   #85
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
It's present throughout the entire corpus of early Christianity, judge. That is Earl's point.
Um no its not. There I just refuted your ridiculous assertion with an equally strong one.

What is present throughout early christian corpus is a human earthly flesh and blood man who was born, ate drank who lived and died on earth.

In other words the early christian documents know nothing of Earl's invention.
The only place it has any credibility is on the internet amongst amatuers.

Tough eh?
Yes, getting around the ignorance and deliberate obtuseness of others is tough. But I feel certain we'll overcome it someday.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:00 PM   #86
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
It's present throughout the entire corpus of early Christianity, judge. That is Earl's point.
Um no its not. There I just refuted your ridiculous assertion with an equally strong one.

What is present throughout early christian corpus is a human earthly flesh and blood man who was born, ate drank who lived and died on earth.

In other words the early christian documents know nothing of Earl's invention.
The only place it has any credibility is on the internet amongst amatuers.

Tough eh?
Could thousands of gullible middle east iron age tribesmen be wrong? People believed and still do.
dogsgod is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:10 PM   #87
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Yes, getting around the ignorance and deliberate obtuseness of others is tough. But I feel certain we'll overcome it someday.

Vorkosigan
Well you'll need some evidence. You presented none.
judge is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:17 PM   #88
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abe
I imagine that there are a handful, but the willingness needs to come from two sides, and I don't think either Dr. Price or Mr. Doherty would be willing to get his ass handed to him by someone with a small name in the field.
Well, Abe, you're about the smallest name there is, and my ass is still securely in place.

The debate will come once Ehrman has published his book, though it may not follow the course you would prefer.

Earl Doherty
EarlDoherty is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:21 PM   #89
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Yes, getting around the ignorance and deliberate obtuseness of others is tough. But I feel certain we'll overcome it someday.

Vorkosigan
Well you'll need some evidence. You presented none.
You offered an exchange of insults, not a conversation. Ask me for something concrete and I will happy to comply.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:21 PM   #90
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlDoherty View Post
Well, Abe, you're about the smallest name there is, and my ass is still securely in place.
Earl Doherty
If you really believed the nonsense you sell you'd stop avoiding peer review.
judge is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.